Searched hist:dde9f095 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance

/linux-master/fs/afs/
H A Dcmservice.cdiff dde9f095 Fri Mar 13 07:46:08 MDT 2020 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> afs: Fix handling of an abort from a service handler

When an AFS service handler function aborts a call, AF_RXRPC marks the call
as complete - which means that it's not going to get any more packets from
the receiver. This is a problem because reception of the final ACK is what
triggers afs_deliver_to_call() to drop the final ref on the afs_call
object.

Instead, aborted AFS service calls may then just sit around waiting for
ever or until they're displaced by a new call on the same connection
channel or a connection-level abort.

Fix this by calling afs_set_call_complete() to finalise the afs_call struct
representing the call.

However, we then need to drop the ref that stops the call from being
deallocated. We can do this in afs_set_call_complete(), as the work queue
is holding a separate ref of its own, but then we shouldn't do it in
afs_process_async_call() and afs_delete_async_call().

call->drop_ref is set to indicate that a ref needs dropping for a call and
this is dealt with when we transition a call to AFS_CALL_COMPLETE.

But then we also need to get rid of the ref that pins an asynchronous
client call. We can do this by the same mechanism, setting call->drop_ref
for an async client call too.

We can also get rid of call->incoming since nothing ever sets it and only
one thing ever checks it (futilely).


A trace of the rxrpc_call and afs_call struct ref counting looks like:

<idle>-0 [001] ..s5 164.764892: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 SEE u=3 sp=rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x473/0xb34 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns5 164.766001: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 QUE u=4 sp=rxrpc_propose_ACK+0xbe/0x551 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns4 164.766005: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 PUT u=3 sp=rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0xa3f/0xb34 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns7 164.766433: afs_call: c=00000002 WAKE u=2 o=11 sp=rxrpc_notify_socket+0x196/0x33c
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.768409: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 SEE u=3 sp=rxrpc_process_call+0x25/0x7ae a=00000000442095b5
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.769439: rxrpc_tx_packet: c=00000002 e9f1a7a8:95786a88:00000008:09c5 00000001 00000000 02 22 ACK CallAck
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.769459: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 PUT u=2 sp=rxrpc_process_call+0x74f/0x7ae a=00000000442095b5
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.770794: afs_call: c=00000002 QUEUE u=3 o=12 sp=afs_deliver_to_call+0x449/0x72c
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.770829: afs_call: c=00000002 PUT u=2 o=12 sp=afs_process_async_call+0xdb/0x11e
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...2 164.771084: rxrpc_abort: c=00000002 95786a88:00000008 s=0 a=1 e=1 K-1
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.771461: rxrpc_tx_packet: c=00000002 e9f1a7a8:95786a88:00000008:09c5 00000002 00000000 04 00 ABORT CallAbort
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.771466: afs_call: c=00000002 PUT u=1 o=12 sp=SRXAFSCB_ProbeUuid+0xc1/0x106

The abort generated in SRXAFSCB_ProbeUuid(), labelled "K-1", indicates that
the local filesystem/cache manager didn't recognise the UUID as its own.

Fixes: 2067b2b3f484 ("afs: Fix the CB.ProbeUuid service handler to reply correctly")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A Drxrpc.cdiff dde9f095 Fri Mar 13 07:46:08 MDT 2020 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> afs: Fix handling of an abort from a service handler

When an AFS service handler function aborts a call, AF_RXRPC marks the call
as complete - which means that it's not going to get any more packets from
the receiver. This is a problem because reception of the final ACK is what
triggers afs_deliver_to_call() to drop the final ref on the afs_call
object.

Instead, aborted AFS service calls may then just sit around waiting for
ever or until they're displaced by a new call on the same connection
channel or a connection-level abort.

Fix this by calling afs_set_call_complete() to finalise the afs_call struct
representing the call.

However, we then need to drop the ref that stops the call from being
deallocated. We can do this in afs_set_call_complete(), as the work queue
is holding a separate ref of its own, but then we shouldn't do it in
afs_process_async_call() and afs_delete_async_call().

call->drop_ref is set to indicate that a ref needs dropping for a call and
this is dealt with when we transition a call to AFS_CALL_COMPLETE.

But then we also need to get rid of the ref that pins an asynchronous
client call. We can do this by the same mechanism, setting call->drop_ref
for an async client call too.

We can also get rid of call->incoming since nothing ever sets it and only
one thing ever checks it (futilely).


A trace of the rxrpc_call and afs_call struct ref counting looks like:

<idle>-0 [001] ..s5 164.764892: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 SEE u=3 sp=rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x473/0xb34 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns5 164.766001: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 QUE u=4 sp=rxrpc_propose_ACK+0xbe/0x551 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns4 164.766005: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 PUT u=3 sp=rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0xa3f/0xb34 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns7 164.766433: afs_call: c=00000002 WAKE u=2 o=11 sp=rxrpc_notify_socket+0x196/0x33c
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.768409: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 SEE u=3 sp=rxrpc_process_call+0x25/0x7ae a=00000000442095b5
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.769439: rxrpc_tx_packet: c=00000002 e9f1a7a8:95786a88:00000008:09c5 00000001 00000000 02 22 ACK CallAck
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.769459: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 PUT u=2 sp=rxrpc_process_call+0x74f/0x7ae a=00000000442095b5
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.770794: afs_call: c=00000002 QUEUE u=3 o=12 sp=afs_deliver_to_call+0x449/0x72c
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.770829: afs_call: c=00000002 PUT u=2 o=12 sp=afs_process_async_call+0xdb/0x11e
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...2 164.771084: rxrpc_abort: c=00000002 95786a88:00000008 s=0 a=1 e=1 K-1
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.771461: rxrpc_tx_packet: c=00000002 e9f1a7a8:95786a88:00000008:09c5 00000002 00000000 04 00 ABORT CallAbort
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.771466: afs_call: c=00000002 PUT u=1 o=12 sp=SRXAFSCB_ProbeUuid+0xc1/0x106

The abort generated in SRXAFSCB_ProbeUuid(), labelled "K-1", indicates that
the local filesystem/cache manager didn't recognise the UUID as its own.

Fixes: 2067b2b3f484 ("afs: Fix the CB.ProbeUuid service handler to reply correctly")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A Dinternal.hdiff dde9f095 Fri Mar 13 07:46:08 MDT 2020 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> afs: Fix handling of an abort from a service handler

When an AFS service handler function aborts a call, AF_RXRPC marks the call
as complete - which means that it's not going to get any more packets from
the receiver. This is a problem because reception of the final ACK is what
triggers afs_deliver_to_call() to drop the final ref on the afs_call
object.

Instead, aborted AFS service calls may then just sit around waiting for
ever or until they're displaced by a new call on the same connection
channel or a connection-level abort.

Fix this by calling afs_set_call_complete() to finalise the afs_call struct
representing the call.

However, we then need to drop the ref that stops the call from being
deallocated. We can do this in afs_set_call_complete(), as the work queue
is holding a separate ref of its own, but then we shouldn't do it in
afs_process_async_call() and afs_delete_async_call().

call->drop_ref is set to indicate that a ref needs dropping for a call and
this is dealt with when we transition a call to AFS_CALL_COMPLETE.

But then we also need to get rid of the ref that pins an asynchronous
client call. We can do this by the same mechanism, setting call->drop_ref
for an async client call too.

We can also get rid of call->incoming since nothing ever sets it and only
one thing ever checks it (futilely).


A trace of the rxrpc_call and afs_call struct ref counting looks like:

<idle>-0 [001] ..s5 164.764892: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 SEE u=3 sp=rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x473/0xb34 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns5 164.766001: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 QUE u=4 sp=rxrpc_propose_ACK+0xbe/0x551 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns4 164.766005: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 PUT u=3 sp=rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0xa3f/0xb34 a=00000000442095b5
<idle>-0 [001] .Ns7 164.766433: afs_call: c=00000002 WAKE u=2 o=11 sp=rxrpc_notify_socket+0x196/0x33c
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.768409: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 SEE u=3 sp=rxrpc_process_call+0x25/0x7ae a=00000000442095b5
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.769439: rxrpc_tx_packet: c=00000002 e9f1a7a8:95786a88:00000008:09c5 00000001 00000000 02 22 ACK CallAck
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.769459: rxrpc_call: c=00000002 PUT u=2 sp=rxrpc_process_call+0x74f/0x7ae a=00000000442095b5
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.770794: afs_call: c=00000002 QUEUE u=3 o=12 sp=afs_deliver_to_call+0x449/0x72c
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.770829: afs_call: c=00000002 PUT u=2 o=12 sp=afs_process_async_call+0xdb/0x11e
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...2 164.771084: rxrpc_abort: c=00000002 95786a88:00000008 s=0 a=1 e=1 K-1
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.771461: rxrpc_tx_packet: c=00000002 e9f1a7a8:95786a88:00000008:09c5 00000002 00000000 04 00 ABORT CallAbort
kworker/1:2-1810 [001] ...1 164.771466: afs_call: c=00000002 PUT u=1 o=12 sp=SRXAFSCB_ProbeUuid+0xc1/0x106

The abort generated in SRXAFSCB_ProbeUuid(), labelled "K-1", indicates that
the local filesystem/cache manager didn't recognise the UUID as its own.

Fixes: 2067b2b3f484 ("afs: Fix the CB.ProbeUuid service handler to reply correctly")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Completed in 483 milliseconds