Searched +hist:9 +hist:da0763b (Results 1 - 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
/linux-master/ | ||
H A D | Makefile | diff 9d361173 Sat Oct 14 04:54:36 MDT 2023 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: unify no-compiler-targets and no-sync-config-targets Now that vdso_install does not depend on any in-tree build artifact, it no longer needs a compiler, making no-compiler-targets the same as no-sync-config-targets. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> diff 5fc10e76 Mon Jun 26 17:30:13 MDT 2023 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: revive "Entering directory" for Make >= 4.4.1 With commit 9da0763bdd82 ("kbuild: Use relative path when building in a subdir of the source tree"), compiler messages in out-of-tree builds include relative paths, which are relative to the build directory, not the directory where make was started. To help IDEs/editors find the source files, Kbuild lets GNU Make print "Entering directory ..." when it changes the working directory. It has been working fine for a long time, but David reported it is broken with the latest GNU Make. The behavior was changed by GNU Make commit 8f9e7722ff0f ("[SV 63537] Fix setting -w in makefiles"). Previously, setting --no-print-directory to MAKEFLAGS only affected child makes, but it is now interpreted in the current make as soon as it is set. [test code] $ cat /tmp/Makefile ifneq ($(SUBMAKE),1) MAKEFLAGS += --no-print-directory all: ; $(MAKE) SUBMAKE=1 else all: ; : endif [before 8f9e7722ff0f] $ make -C /tmp make: Entering directory '/tmp' make SUBMAKE=1 : make: Leaving directory '/tmp' [after 8f9e7722ff0f] $ make -C /tmp make SUBMAKE=1 : Previously, the effect of --no-print-directory was delayed until Kbuild started the directory descending, but it is no longer true with GNU Make 4.4.1. This commit adds one more recursion to cater to GNU Make >= 4.4.1. When Kbuild needs to change the working directory, __submake will be executed twice. __submake without --no-print-directory --> show "Entering directory ..." __submake with --no-print-directory --> parse the rest of Makefile We end up with one more recursion than needed for GNU Make < 4.4.1, but I do not want to complicate the version check. Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2427604.1686237298@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Tested-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de> diff 9c73bcfa Tue Jan 17 22:05:34 MST 2023 Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> kbuild: also delete temporary directories Reuse the standard naming schema for temporary files also for temporary directories. Such a directory will be used by the kheaders generation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> Tested-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> diff 9beccca0 Thu Oct 27 09:59:07 MDT 2022 Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> scs: add support for dynamic shadow call stacks In order to allow arches to use code patching to conditionally emit the shadow stack pushes and pops, rather than always taking the performance hit even on CPUs that implement alternatives such as stack pointer authentication on arm64, add a Kconfig symbol that can be set by the arch to omit the SCS codegen itself, without otherwise affecting how support code for SCS and compiler options (for register reservation, for instance) are emitted. Also, add a static key and some plumbing to omit the allocation of shadow call stack for dynamic SCS configurations if SCS is disabled at runtime. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Tested-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221027155908.1940624-3-ardb@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> diff 9abf2313 Sun Oct 16 16:36:24 MDT 2022 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Linux 6.1-rc1 diff 9c5a0ac3 Sat Sep 24 12:19:12 MDT 2022 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: move vmlinux.o rule to the top Makefile Move the build rules of vmlinux.o out of scripts/link-vmlinux.sh to clearly separate 1) pre-modpost, 2) modpost, 3) post-modpost stages. This will make further refactoring possible. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> diff 9a68fd7f Wed Jul 13 23:02:42 MDT 2022 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: error out if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD) contains % or : If the directory path given to KBUILD_EXTMOD (or M=) contains % or :, the module fails to build. % is used in pattern rules, and : as the separator of dependencies. Bail out with a clearer error message. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de> diff dee2b702 Sat Nov 13 17:57:25 MST 2021 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> kconfig: Add support for -Wimplicit-fallthrough Add Kconfig support for -Wimplicit-fallthrough for both GCC and Clang. The compiler option is under configuration CC_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH, which is enabled by default. Special thanks to Nathan Chancellor who fixed the Clang bug[1][2]. This bugfix only appears in Clang 14.0.0, so older versions still contain the bug and -Wimplicit-fallthrough won't be enabled for them, for now. This concludes a long journey and now we are finally getting rid of the unintentional fallthrough bug-class in the kernel, entirely. :) Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ed4a94d6451046a51ef393cd62f00710820a7e8 [1] Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51094 [2] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/236 Co-developed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Co-developed-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 86cffecd Fri Nov 05 14:36:19 MDT 2021 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Compiler Attributes: add __alloc_size() for better bounds checking GCC and Clang can use the "alloc_size" attribute to better inform the results of __builtin_object_size() (for compile-time constant values). Clang can additionally use alloc_size to inform the results of __builtin_dynamic_object_size() (for run-time values). Because GCC sees the frequent use of struct_size() as an allocator size argument, and notices it can return SIZE_MAX (the overflow indication), it complains about these call sites overflowing (since SIZE_MAX is greater than the default -Walloc-size-larger-than=PTRDIFF_MAX). This isn't helpful since we already know a SIZE_MAX will be caught at run-time (this was an intentional design). To deal with this, we must disable this check as it is both a false positive and redundant. (Clang does not have this warning option.) Unfortunately, just checking the -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than is not sufficient to make the __alloc_size attribute behave correctly under older GCC versions. The attribute itself must be disabled in those situations too, as there appears to be no way to reliably silence the SIZE_MAX constant expression cases for GCC versions less than 9.1: In file included from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11, from ./include/linux/pci.h:40, from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h:9, from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c:4: In function 'kmalloc_node', inlined from 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector' at ./include/linux/slab.h:743:9: ./include/linux/slab.h:618:9: error: argument 1 value '18446744073709551615' exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=alloc-size-larger-than=] return __kmalloc_node(size, flags, node); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/slab.h: In function 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector': ./include/linux/slab.h:455:7: note: in a call to allocation function '__kmalloc_node' declared here void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Specifically: '-Wno-alloc-size-larger-than' is not correctly handled by GCC < 9.1 https://godbolt.org/z/hqsfG7q84 (doesn't disable) https://godbolt.org/z/P9jdrPTYh (doesn't admit to not knowing about option) https://godbolt.org/z/465TPMWKb (only warns when other warnings appear) '-Walloc-size-larger-than=18446744073709551615' is not handled by GCC < 8.2 https://godbolt.org/z/73hh1EPxz (ignores numeric value) Since anything marked with __alloc_size would also qualify for marking with __malloc, just include __malloc along with it to avoid redundant markings. (Suggested by Linus Torvalds.) Finally, make sure checkpatch.pl doesn't get confused about finding the __alloc_size attribute on functions. (Thanks to Joe Perches.) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930222704.2631604-3-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 86cffecd Fri Nov 05 14:36:19 MDT 2021 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Compiler Attributes: add __alloc_size() for better bounds checking GCC and Clang can use the "alloc_size" attribute to better inform the results of __builtin_object_size() (for compile-time constant values). Clang can additionally use alloc_size to inform the results of __builtin_dynamic_object_size() (for run-time values). Because GCC sees the frequent use of struct_size() as an allocator size argument, and notices it can return SIZE_MAX (the overflow indication), it complains about these call sites overflowing (since SIZE_MAX is greater than the default -Walloc-size-larger-than=PTRDIFF_MAX). This isn't helpful since we already know a SIZE_MAX will be caught at run-time (this was an intentional design). To deal with this, we must disable this check as it is both a false positive and redundant. (Clang does not have this warning option.) Unfortunately, just checking the -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than is not sufficient to make the __alloc_size attribute behave correctly under older GCC versions. The attribute itself must be disabled in those situations too, as there appears to be no way to reliably silence the SIZE_MAX constant expression cases for GCC versions less than 9.1: In file included from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11, from ./include/linux/pci.h:40, from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h:9, from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c:4: In function 'kmalloc_node', inlined from 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector' at ./include/linux/slab.h:743:9: ./include/linux/slab.h:618:9: error: argument 1 value '18446744073709551615' exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=alloc-size-larger-than=] return __kmalloc_node(size, flags, node); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/slab.h: In function 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector': ./include/linux/slab.h:455:7: note: in a call to allocation function '__kmalloc_node' declared here void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Specifically: '-Wno-alloc-size-larger-than' is not correctly handled by GCC < 9.1 https://godbolt.org/z/hqsfG7q84 (doesn't disable) https://godbolt.org/z/P9jdrPTYh (doesn't admit to not knowing about option) https://godbolt.org/z/465TPMWKb (only warns when other warnings appear) '-Walloc-size-larger-than=18446744073709551615' is not handled by GCC < 8.2 https://godbolt.org/z/73hh1EPxz (ignores numeric value) Since anything marked with __alloc_size would also qualify for marking with __malloc, just include __malloc along with it to avoid redundant markings. (Suggested by Linus Torvalds.) Finally, make sure checkpatch.pl doesn't get confused about finding the __alloc_size attribute on functions. (Thanks to Joe Perches.) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930222704.2631604-3-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 86cffecd Fri Nov 05 14:36:19 MDT 2021 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Compiler Attributes: add __alloc_size() for better bounds checking GCC and Clang can use the "alloc_size" attribute to better inform the results of __builtin_object_size() (for compile-time constant values). Clang can additionally use alloc_size to inform the results of __builtin_dynamic_object_size() (for run-time values). Because GCC sees the frequent use of struct_size() as an allocator size argument, and notices it can return SIZE_MAX (the overflow indication), it complains about these call sites overflowing (since SIZE_MAX is greater than the default -Walloc-size-larger-than=PTRDIFF_MAX). This isn't helpful since we already know a SIZE_MAX will be caught at run-time (this was an intentional design). To deal with this, we must disable this check as it is both a false positive and redundant. (Clang does not have this warning option.) Unfortunately, just checking the -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than is not sufficient to make the __alloc_size attribute behave correctly under older GCC versions. The attribute itself must be disabled in those situations too, as there appears to be no way to reliably silence the SIZE_MAX constant expression cases for GCC versions less than 9.1: In file included from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11, from ./include/linux/pci.h:40, from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h:9, from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c:4: In function 'kmalloc_node', inlined from 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector' at ./include/linux/slab.h:743:9: ./include/linux/slab.h:618:9: error: argument 1 value '18446744073709551615' exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=alloc-size-larger-than=] return __kmalloc_node(size, flags, node); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/slab.h: In function 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector': ./include/linux/slab.h:455:7: note: in a call to allocation function '__kmalloc_node' declared here void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Specifically: '-Wno-alloc-size-larger-than' is not correctly handled by GCC < 9.1 https://godbolt.org/z/hqsfG7q84 (doesn't disable) https://godbolt.org/z/P9jdrPTYh (doesn't admit to not knowing about option) https://godbolt.org/z/465TPMWKb (only warns when other warnings appear) '-Walloc-size-larger-than=18446744073709551615' is not handled by GCC < 8.2 https://godbolt.org/z/73hh1EPxz (ignores numeric value) Since anything marked with __alloc_size would also qualify for marking with __malloc, just include __malloc along with it to avoid redundant markings. (Suggested by Linus Torvalds.) Finally, make sure checkpatch.pl doesn't get confused about finding the __alloc_size attribute on functions. (Thanks to Joe Perches.) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930222704.2631604-3-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
Completed in 1016 milliseconds