Searched +hist:7 +hist:f26482a (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/kernel/locking/ | ||
| H A D | percpu-rwsem.c | diff d22cc7f6 Mon Mar 30 15:30:02 MDT 2020 Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> locking/percpu-rwsem: Fix a task_struct refcount The following commit: 7f26482a872c ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem") introduced task_struct memory leaks due to messing up the task_struct refcount. At the beginning of percpu_rwsem_wake_function(), it calls get_task_struct(), but if the trylock failed, it will remain in the waitqueue. However, it will run percpu_rwsem_wake_function() again with get_task_struct() to increase the refcount but then only call put_task_struct() once the trylock succeeded. Fix it by adjusting percpu_rwsem_wake_function() a bit to guard against when percpu_rwsem_wait() observing !private, terminating the wait and doing a quick exit() while percpu_rwsem_wake_function() then doing wake_up_process(p) as a use-after-free. Fixes: 7f26482a872c ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200330213002.2374-1-cai@lca.pw diff d22cc7f6 Mon Mar 30 15:30:02 MDT 2020 Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> locking/percpu-rwsem: Fix a task_struct refcount The following commit: 7f26482a872c ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem") introduced task_struct memory leaks due to messing up the task_struct refcount. At the beginning of percpu_rwsem_wake_function(), it calls get_task_struct(), but if the trylock failed, it will remain in the waitqueue. However, it will run percpu_rwsem_wake_function() again with get_task_struct() to increase the refcount but then only call put_task_struct() once the trylock succeeded. Fix it by adjusting percpu_rwsem_wake_function() a bit to guard against when percpu_rwsem_wait() observing !private, terminating the wait and doing a quick exit() while percpu_rwsem_wake_function() then doing wake_up_process(p) as a use-after-free. Fixes: 7f26482a872c ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200330213002.2374-1-cai@lca.pw diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff 46ad0840 Fri Mar 22 08:30:06 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files As the generic rwsem-xadd code is using the appropriate acquire and release versions of the atomic operations, the arch specific rwsem.h files will not be that much faster than the generic code as long as the atomic functions are properly implemented. So we can remove those arch specific rwsem.h and stop building asm/rwsem.h to reduce maintenance effort. Currently, only x86, alpha and ia64 have implemented architecture specific fast paths. I don't have access to alpha and ia64 systems for testing, but they are legacy systems that are not likely to be updated to the latest kernel anyway. By using a rwsem microbenchmark, the total locking rates on a 4-socket 56-core 112-thread x86-64 system before and after the patch were as follows (mixed means equal # of read and write locks): Before Patch After Patch # of Threads wlock rlock mixed wlock rlock mixed ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 29,201 30,143 29,458 28,615 30,172 29,201 2 6,807 13,299 1,171 7,725 15,025 1,804 4 6,504 12,755 1,520 7,127 14,286 1,345 8 6,762 13,412 764 6,826 13,652 726 16 6,693 15,408 662 6,599 15,938 626 32 6,145 15,286 496 5,549 15,487 511 64 5,812 15,495 60 5,858 15,572 60 There were some run-to-run variations for the multi-thread tests. For x86-64, using the generic C code fast path seems to be a little bit faster than the assembly version with low lock contention. Looking at the assembly version of the fast paths, there are assembly to/from C code wrappers that save and restore all the callee-clobbered registers (7 registers on x86-64). The assembly generated from the generic C code doesn't need to do that. That may explain the slight performance gain here. The generic asm rwsem.h can also be merged into kernel/locking/rwsem.h with no code change as no other code other than those under kernel/locking needs to access the internal rwsem macros and functions. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190322143008.21313-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 46ad0840 Fri Mar 22 08:30:06 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files As the generic rwsem-xadd code is using the appropriate acquire and release versions of the atomic operations, the arch specific rwsem.h files will not be that much faster than the generic code as long as the atomic functions are properly implemented. So we can remove those arch specific rwsem.h and stop building asm/rwsem.h to reduce maintenance effort. Currently, only x86, alpha and ia64 have implemented architecture specific fast paths. I don't have access to alpha and ia64 systems for testing, but they are legacy systems that are not likely to be updated to the latest kernel anyway. By using a rwsem microbenchmark, the total locking rates on a 4-socket 56-core 112-thread x86-64 system before and after the patch were as follows (mixed means equal # of read and write locks): Before Patch After Patch # of Threads wlock rlock mixed wlock rlock mixed ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 29,201 30,143 29,458 28,615 30,172 29,201 2 6,807 13,299 1,171 7,725 15,025 1,804 4 6,504 12,755 1,520 7,127 14,286 1,345 8 6,762 13,412 764 6,826 13,652 726 16 6,693 15,408 662 6,599 15,938 626 32 6,145 15,286 496 5,549 15,487 511 64 5,812 15,495 60 5,858 15,572 60 There were some run-to-run variations for the multi-thread tests. For x86-64, using the generic C code fast path seems to be a little bit faster than the assembly version with low lock contention. Looking at the assembly version of the fast paths, there are assembly to/from C code wrappers that save and restore all the callee-clobbered registers (7 registers on x86-64). The assembly generated from the generic C code doesn't need to do that. That may explain the slight performance gain here. The generic asm rwsem.h can also be merged into kernel/locking/rwsem.h with no code change as no other code other than those under kernel/locking needs to access the internal rwsem macros and functions. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190322143008.21313-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 46ad0840 Fri Mar 22 08:30:06 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files As the generic rwsem-xadd code is using the appropriate acquire and release versions of the atomic operations, the arch specific rwsem.h files will not be that much faster than the generic code as long as the atomic functions are properly implemented. So we can remove those arch specific rwsem.h and stop building asm/rwsem.h to reduce maintenance effort. Currently, only x86, alpha and ia64 have implemented architecture specific fast paths. I don't have access to alpha and ia64 systems for testing, but they are legacy systems that are not likely to be updated to the latest kernel anyway. By using a rwsem microbenchmark, the total locking rates on a 4-socket 56-core 112-thread x86-64 system before and after the patch were as follows (mixed means equal # of read and write locks): Before Patch After Patch # of Threads wlock rlock mixed wlock rlock mixed ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 29,201 30,143 29,458 28,615 30,172 29,201 2 6,807 13,299 1,171 7,725 15,025 1,804 4 6,504 12,755 1,520 7,127 14,286 1,345 8 6,762 13,412 764 6,826 13,652 726 16 6,693 15,408 662 6,599 15,938 626 32 6,145 15,286 496 5,549 15,487 511 64 5,812 15,495 60 5,858 15,572 60 There were some run-to-run variations for the multi-thread tests. For x86-64, using the generic C code fast path seems to be a little bit faster than the assembly version with low lock contention. Looking at the assembly version of the fast paths, there are assembly to/from C code wrappers that save and restore all the callee-clobbered registers (7 registers on x86-64). The assembly generated from the generic C code doesn't need to do that. That may explain the slight performance gain here. The generic asm rwsem.h can also be merged into kernel/locking/rwsem.h with no code change as no other code other than those under kernel/locking needs to access the internal rwsem macros and functions. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190322143008.21313-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
| H A D | rwsem.c | diff 7cdacc5f Wed Oct 13 07:41:53 MDT 2021 Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> locking/rwsem: Disable preemption for spinning region The spinning region rwsem_spin_on_owner() should not be preempted, however the rwsem_down_write_slowpath() invokes it and don't disable preemption. Fix it by adding a pair of preempt_disable/enable(). Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> [peterz: Fix CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER=n build] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211013134154.1085649-3-yanfei.xu@windriver.com diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff 91d2a812 Tue Jun 25 08:39:13 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Make handoff writer optimistically spin on owner When the handoff bit is set by a writer, no other tasks other than the setting writer itself is allowed to acquire the lock. If the to-be-handoff'ed writer goes to sleep, there will be a wakeup latency period where the lock is free, but no one can acquire it. That is less than ideal. To reduce that latency, the handoff writer will now optimistically spin on the owner if it happens to be a on-cpu writer. It will spin until it releases the lock and the to-be-handoff'ed writer can then acquire the lock immediately without any delay. Of course, if the owner is not a on-cpu writer, the to-be-handoff'ed writer will have to sleep anyway. The optimistic spinning code is also modified to not stop spinning when the handoff bit is set. This will prevent an occasional setting of handoff bit from causing a bunch of optimistic spinners from entering into the wait queue causing significant reduction in throughput. On a 1-socket 22-core 44-thread Skylake system, the AIM7 shared_memory workload was run with 7000 users. The throughput (jobs/min) of the following kernels were as follows: 1) 5.2-rc6 - 8,092,486 2) 5.2-rc6 + tip's rwsem patches - 7,567,568 3) 5.2-rc6 + tip's rwsem patches + this patch - 7,954,545 Using perf-record(1), the %cpu time used by rwsem_down_write_slowpath(), rwsem_down_write_failed() and their callees for the 3 kernels were 1.70%, 5.46% and 2.08% respectively. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625143913.24154-1-longman@redhat.com diff 91d2a812 Tue Jun 25 08:39:13 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Make handoff writer optimistically spin on owner When the handoff bit is set by a writer, no other tasks other than the setting writer itself is allowed to acquire the lock. If the to-be-handoff'ed writer goes to sleep, there will be a wakeup latency period where the lock is free, but no one can acquire it. That is less than ideal. To reduce that latency, the handoff writer will now optimistically spin on the owner if it happens to be a on-cpu writer. It will spin until it releases the lock and the to-be-handoff'ed writer can then acquire the lock immediately without any delay. Of course, if the owner is not a on-cpu writer, the to-be-handoff'ed writer will have to sleep anyway. The optimistic spinning code is also modified to not stop spinning when the handoff bit is set. This will prevent an occasional setting of handoff bit from causing a bunch of optimistic spinners from entering into the wait queue causing significant reduction in throughput. On a 1-socket 22-core 44-thread Skylake system, the AIM7 shared_memory workload was run with 7000 users. The throughput (jobs/min) of the following kernels were as follows: 1) 5.2-rc6 - 8,092,486 2) 5.2-rc6 + tip's rwsem patches - 7,567,568 3) 5.2-rc6 + tip's rwsem patches + this patch - 7,954,545 Using perf-record(1), the %cpu time used by rwsem_down_write_slowpath(), rwsem_down_write_failed() and their callees for the 3 kernels were 1.70%, 5.46% and 2.08% respectively. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625143913.24154-1-longman@redhat.com diff 7d43f1ce Mon May 20 14:59:13 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem When the rwsem is owned by reader, writers stop optimistic spinning simply because there is no easy way to figure out if all the readers are actively running or not. However, there are scenarios where the readers are unlikely to sleep and optimistic spinning can help performance. This patch provides a simple mechanism for spinning on a reader-owned rwsem by a writer. It is a time threshold based spinning where the allowable spinning time can vary from 10us to 25us depending on the condition of the rwsem. When the time threshold is exceeded, the nonspinnable bits will be set in the owner field to indicate that no more optimistic spinning will be allowed on this rwsem until it becomes writer owned again. Not even readers is allowed to acquire the reader-locked rwsem by optimistic spinning for fairness. We also want a writer to acquire the lock after the readers hold the lock for a relatively long time. In order to give preference to writers under such a circumstance, the single RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit is now split into two - one for reader and one for writer. When optimistic spinning is disabled, both bits will be set. When the reader count drop down to 0, the writer nonspinnable bit will be cleared to allow writers to spin on the lock, but not the readers. When a writer acquires the lock, it will write its own task structure pointer into sem->owner and clear the reader nonspinnable bit in the process. The time taken for each iteration of the reader-owned rwsem spinning loop varies. Below are sample minimum elapsed times for 16 iterations of the loop. System Time for 16 Iterations ------ ---------------------- 1-socket Skylake ~800ns 4-socket Broadwell ~300ns 2-socket ThunderX2 (arm64) ~250ns When the lock cacheline is contended, we can see up to almost 10X increase in elapsed time. So 25us will be at most 500, 1300 and 1600 iterations for each of the above systems. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 2 1,759 6,684 4 1,684 6,738 8 1,074 7,222 16 900 7,163 32 458 7,316 64 208 520 128 168 425 240 143 474 This patch gives a big boost in performance for mixed reader/writer workloads. With 32 locking threads, the rwsem lock event data were: rwsem_opt_fail=79850 rwsem_opt_nospin=5069 rwsem_opt_rlock=597484 rwsem_opt_wlock=957339 rwsem_sleep_reader=57782 rwsem_sleep_writer=55663 With 64 locking threads, the data looked like: rwsem_opt_fail=346723 rwsem_opt_nospin=6293 rwsem_opt_rlock=1127119 rwsem_opt_wlock=1400628 rwsem_sleep_reader=308201 rwsem_sleep_writer=72281 So a lot more threads acquired the lock in the slowpath and more threads went to sleep. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-15-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 7d43f1ce Mon May 20 14:59:13 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem When the rwsem is owned by reader, writers stop optimistic spinning simply because there is no easy way to figure out if all the readers are actively running or not. However, there are scenarios where the readers are unlikely to sleep and optimistic spinning can help performance. This patch provides a simple mechanism for spinning on a reader-owned rwsem by a writer. It is a time threshold based spinning where the allowable spinning time can vary from 10us to 25us depending on the condition of the rwsem. When the time threshold is exceeded, the nonspinnable bits will be set in the owner field to indicate that no more optimistic spinning will be allowed on this rwsem until it becomes writer owned again. Not even readers is allowed to acquire the reader-locked rwsem by optimistic spinning for fairness. We also want a writer to acquire the lock after the readers hold the lock for a relatively long time. In order to give preference to writers under such a circumstance, the single RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit is now split into two - one for reader and one for writer. When optimistic spinning is disabled, both bits will be set. When the reader count drop down to 0, the writer nonspinnable bit will be cleared to allow writers to spin on the lock, but not the readers. When a writer acquires the lock, it will write its own task structure pointer into sem->owner and clear the reader nonspinnable bit in the process. The time taken for each iteration of the reader-owned rwsem spinning loop varies. Below are sample minimum elapsed times for 16 iterations of the loop. System Time for 16 Iterations ------ ---------------------- 1-socket Skylake ~800ns 4-socket Broadwell ~300ns 2-socket ThunderX2 (arm64) ~250ns When the lock cacheline is contended, we can see up to almost 10X increase in elapsed time. So 25us will be at most 500, 1300 and 1600 iterations for each of the above systems. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 2 1,759 6,684 4 1,684 6,738 8 1,074 7,222 16 900 7,163 32 458 7,316 64 208 520 128 168 425 240 143 474 This patch gives a big boost in performance for mixed reader/writer workloads. With 32 locking threads, the rwsem lock event data were: rwsem_opt_fail=79850 rwsem_opt_nospin=5069 rwsem_opt_rlock=597484 rwsem_opt_wlock=957339 rwsem_sleep_reader=57782 rwsem_sleep_writer=55663 With 64 locking threads, the data looked like: rwsem_opt_fail=346723 rwsem_opt_nospin=6293 rwsem_opt_rlock=1127119 rwsem_opt_wlock=1400628 rwsem_sleep_reader=308201 rwsem_sleep_writer=72281 So a lot more threads acquired the lock in the slowpath and more threads went to sleep. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-15-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 7d43f1ce Mon May 20 14:59:13 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem When the rwsem is owned by reader, writers stop optimistic spinning simply because there is no easy way to figure out if all the readers are actively running or not. However, there are scenarios where the readers are unlikely to sleep and optimistic spinning can help performance. This patch provides a simple mechanism for spinning on a reader-owned rwsem by a writer. It is a time threshold based spinning where the allowable spinning time can vary from 10us to 25us depending on the condition of the rwsem. When the time threshold is exceeded, the nonspinnable bits will be set in the owner field to indicate that no more optimistic spinning will be allowed on this rwsem until it becomes writer owned again. Not even readers is allowed to acquire the reader-locked rwsem by optimistic spinning for fairness. We also want a writer to acquire the lock after the readers hold the lock for a relatively long time. In order to give preference to writers under such a circumstance, the single RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit is now split into two - one for reader and one for writer. When optimistic spinning is disabled, both bits will be set. When the reader count drop down to 0, the writer nonspinnable bit will be cleared to allow writers to spin on the lock, but not the readers. When a writer acquires the lock, it will write its own task structure pointer into sem->owner and clear the reader nonspinnable bit in the process. The time taken for each iteration of the reader-owned rwsem spinning loop varies. Below are sample minimum elapsed times for 16 iterations of the loop. System Time for 16 Iterations ------ ---------------------- 1-socket Skylake ~800ns 4-socket Broadwell ~300ns 2-socket ThunderX2 (arm64) ~250ns When the lock cacheline is contended, we can see up to almost 10X increase in elapsed time. So 25us will be at most 500, 1300 and 1600 iterations for each of the above systems. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 2 1,759 6,684 4 1,684 6,738 8 1,074 7,222 16 900 7,163 32 458 7,316 64 208 520 128 168 425 240 143 474 This patch gives a big boost in performance for mixed reader/writer workloads. With 32 locking threads, the rwsem lock event data were: rwsem_opt_fail=79850 rwsem_opt_nospin=5069 rwsem_opt_rlock=597484 rwsem_opt_wlock=957339 rwsem_sleep_reader=57782 rwsem_sleep_writer=55663 With 64 locking threads, the data looked like: rwsem_opt_fail=346723 rwsem_opt_nospin=6293 rwsem_opt_rlock=1127119 rwsem_opt_wlock=1400628 rwsem_sleep_reader=308201 rwsem_sleep_writer=72281 So a lot more threads acquired the lock in the slowpath and more threads went to sleep. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-15-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 7d43f1ce Mon May 20 14:59:13 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem When the rwsem is owned by reader, writers stop optimistic spinning simply because there is no easy way to figure out if all the readers are actively running or not. However, there are scenarios where the readers are unlikely to sleep and optimistic spinning can help performance. This patch provides a simple mechanism for spinning on a reader-owned rwsem by a writer. It is a time threshold based spinning where the allowable spinning time can vary from 10us to 25us depending on the condition of the rwsem. When the time threshold is exceeded, the nonspinnable bits will be set in the owner field to indicate that no more optimistic spinning will be allowed on this rwsem until it becomes writer owned again. Not even readers is allowed to acquire the reader-locked rwsem by optimistic spinning for fairness. We also want a writer to acquire the lock after the readers hold the lock for a relatively long time. In order to give preference to writers under such a circumstance, the single RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit is now split into two - one for reader and one for writer. When optimistic spinning is disabled, both bits will be set. When the reader count drop down to 0, the writer nonspinnable bit will be cleared to allow writers to spin on the lock, but not the readers. When a writer acquires the lock, it will write its own task structure pointer into sem->owner and clear the reader nonspinnable bit in the process. The time taken for each iteration of the reader-owned rwsem spinning loop varies. Below are sample minimum elapsed times for 16 iterations of the loop. System Time for 16 Iterations ------ ---------------------- 1-socket Skylake ~800ns 4-socket Broadwell ~300ns 2-socket ThunderX2 (arm64) ~250ns When the lock cacheline is contended, we can see up to almost 10X increase in elapsed time. So 25us will be at most 500, 1300 and 1600 iterations for each of the above systems. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 2 1,759 6,684 4 1,684 6,738 8 1,074 7,222 16 900 7,163 32 458 7,316 64 208 520 128 168 425 240 143 474 This patch gives a big boost in performance for mixed reader/writer workloads. With 32 locking threads, the rwsem lock event data were: rwsem_opt_fail=79850 rwsem_opt_nospin=5069 rwsem_opt_rlock=597484 rwsem_opt_wlock=957339 rwsem_sleep_reader=57782 rwsem_sleep_writer=55663 With 64 locking threads, the data looked like: rwsem_opt_fail=346723 rwsem_opt_nospin=6293 rwsem_opt_rlock=1127119 rwsem_opt_wlock=1400628 rwsem_sleep_reader=308201 rwsem_sleep_writer=72281 So a lot more threads acquired the lock in the slowpath and more threads went to sleep. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-15-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 4f23dbc1 Mon May 20 14:59:06 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation Because of writer lock stealing, it is possible that a constant stream of incoming writers will cause a waiting writer or reader to wait indefinitely leading to lock starvation. This patch implements a lock handoff mechanism to disable lock stealing and force lock handoff to the first waiter or waiters (for readers) in the queue after at least a 4ms waiting period unless it is a RT writer task which doesn't need to wait. The waiting period is used to avoid discouraging lock stealing too much to affect performance. The setting and clearing of the handoff bit is serialized by the wait_lock. So racing is not possible. A rwsem microbenchmark was run for 5 seconds on a 2-socket 40-core 80-thread Skylake system with a v5.1 based kernel and 240 write_lock threads with 5us sleep critical section. Before the patch, the min/mean/max numbers of locking operations for the locking threads were 1/7,792/173,696. After the patch, the figures became 5,842/6,542/7,458. It can be seen that the rwsem became much more fair, though there was a drop of about 16% in the mean locking operations done which was a tradeoff of having better fairness. Making the waiter set the handoff bit right after the first wakeup can impact performance especially with a mixed reader/writer workload. With the same microbenchmark with short critical section and equal number of reader and writer threads (40/40), the reader/writer locking operation counts with the current patch were: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/1,794/1,796 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/34,956/86,081 By making waiter set handoff bit immediately after wakeup: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/44/46 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/1,263/3,191 Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-8-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 4f23dbc1 Mon May 20 14:59:06 MDT 2019 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation Because of writer lock stealing, it is possible that a constant stream of incoming writers will cause a waiting writer or reader to wait indefinitely leading to lock starvation. This patch implements a lock handoff mechanism to disable lock stealing and force lock handoff to the first waiter or waiters (for readers) in the queue after at least a 4ms waiting period unless it is a RT writer task which doesn't need to wait. The waiting period is used to avoid discouraging lock stealing too much to affect performance. The setting and clearing of the handoff bit is serialized by the wait_lock. So racing is not possible. A rwsem microbenchmark was run for 5 seconds on a 2-socket 40-core 80-thread Skylake system with a v5.1 based kernel and 240 write_lock threads with 5us sleep critical section. Before the patch, the min/mean/max numbers of locking operations for the locking threads were 1/7,792/173,696. After the patch, the figures became 5,842/6,542/7,458. It can be seen that the rwsem became much more fair, though there was a drop of about 16% in the mean locking operations done which was a tradeoff of having better fairness. Making the waiter set the handoff bit right after the first wakeup can impact performance especially with a mixed reader/writer workload. With the same microbenchmark with short critical section and equal number of reader and writer threads (40/40), the reader/writer locking operation counts with the current patch were: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/1,794/1,796 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/34,956/86,081 By making waiter set handoff bit immediately after wakeup: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/44/46 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/1,263/3,191 Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-8-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
| /linux-master/include/linux/ | ||
| H A D | percpu-rwsem.h | diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net |
| H A D | wait.h | diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff 7f26482a Wed Oct 30 13:30:41 MDT 2019 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove the embedded rwsem The filesystem freezer uses percpu-rwsem in a way that is effectively write_non_owner() and achieves this with a few horrible hacks that rely on the rwsem (!percpu) implementation. When PREEMPT_RT replaces the rwsem implementation with a PI aware variant this comes apart. Remove the embedded rwsem and implement it using a waitqueue and an atomic_t. - make readers_block an atomic, and use it, with the waitqueue for a blocking test-and-set write-side. - have the read-side wait for the 'lock' state to clear. Have the waiters use FIFO queueing and mark them (reader/writer) with a new WQ_FLAG. Use a custom wake_function to wake either a single writer or all readers until a writer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092403.GB14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net diff b1ea06a9 Thu Sep 08 10:48:15 MDT 2016 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> sched/wait: Avoid abort_exclusive_wait() in ___wait_event() ___wait_event() doesn't really need abort_exclusive_wait(), we can simply change prepare_to_wait_event() to remove the waiter from q->task_list if it was interrupted. This simplifies the code/logic, and this way prepare_to_wait_event() can have more users, see the next change. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160908164815.GA18801@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -- include/linux/wait.h | 7 +------ kernel/sched/wait.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff 7e605987 Thu Apr 30 22:19:56 MDT 2015 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> sched/wait: Change wait_on_bit*() to take an unsigned long *, not a void * The implementations of wait_on_bit*() will only work with long-aligned memory on systems that don't support misaligned loads and stores. This patch changes the function prototypes to ensure that the compiler will enforce alignment. Running make defconfig make KFLAGS="-Werror" seems to indicate that, as of c56fb6564dcd ("Fix a misaligned load inside ptrace_attach()"), there are now no users of non-long-aligned calls to wait_on_bit*(). I additionally tried a few "make randconfig" attempts, none of which failed to compile for this reason. Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bobby.prani@gmail.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: richard@nod.at Cc: vdavydov@parallels.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430453997-32459-3-git-send-email-palmer@dabbelt.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 7d716456 Wed Oct 30 17:48:14 MDT 2013 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> sched/wait: Fix __wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout() __wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout() needs the timeout parameter passed instead of "ret". This magically compiled since the only user has a local ret variable. Luckily we got a build warning: CC drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.o drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c: In function 'zfcp_qdio_sbal_get': include/linux/wait.h:780:15: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131031114814.GB5551@osiris Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 7d478721 Mon Sep 14 11:55:44 MDT 2009 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> sched: Rename sync arguments In order to extend the functions to have more than 1 flag (sync), rename the argument to flags, and explicitly define a WF_ space for individual flags. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> diff 7e43c84e Tue May 24 17:31:42 MDT 2005 Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> [PATCH] Cleanup DEFINE_WAIT Use LIST_HEAD_INIT rather than doing it by hand in DEFINE_WAIT. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> |
Completed in 344 milliseconds