Searched +hist:6 +hist:a2aeab5 (Results 1 - 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/fs/ | ||
| H A D | seq_file.c | diff 6a2aeab5 Tue Aug 13 16:37:44 MDT 2019 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> seq_file: fix problem when seeking mid-record If you use lseek or similar (e.g. pread) to access a location in a seq_file file that is within a record, rather than at a record boundary, then the first read will return the remainder of the record, and the second read will return the whole of that same record (instead of the next record). When seeking to a record boundary, the next record is correctly returned. This bug was introduced by a recent patch (identified below). Before that patch, seq_read() would increment m->index when the last of the buffer was returned (m->count == 0). After that patch, we rely on ->next to increment m->index after filling the buffer - but there was one place where that didn't happen. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/877e7xl029.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name/ Fixes: 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code and interface") Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reported-by: Sergei Turchanov <turchanov@farpost.com> Tested-by: Sergei Turchanov <turchanov@farpost.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 6a2aeab5 Tue Aug 13 16:37:44 MDT 2019 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> seq_file: fix problem when seeking mid-record If you use lseek or similar (e.g. pread) to access a location in a seq_file file that is within a record, rather than at a record boundary, then the first read will return the remainder of the record, and the second read will return the whole of that same record (instead of the next record). When seeking to a record boundary, the next record is correctly returned. This bug was introduced by a recent patch (identified below). Before that patch, seq_read() would increment m->index when the last of the buffer was returned (m->count == 0). After that patch, we rely on ->next to increment m->index after filling the buffer - but there was one place where that didn't happen. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/877e7xl029.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name/ Fixes: 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code and interface") Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reported-by: Sergei Turchanov <turchanov@farpost.com> Tested-by: Sergei Turchanov <turchanov@farpost.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 0a4c9265 Wed Jan 23 01:48:28 MST 2019 Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> diff 6c04ab0e Fri May 25 15:47:50 MDT 2018 Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> proc: fix smaps and meminfo alignment The 4.17-rc /proc/meminfo and /proc/<pid>/smaps look ugly: single-digit numbers (commonly 0) are misaligned. Remove seq_put_decimal_ull_width()'s leftover optimization for single digits: it's wrong now that num_to_str() takes care of the width. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1805241554210.1326@eggly.anvils Fixes: d1be35cb6f96 ("proc: add seq_put_decimal_ull_width to speed up /proc/pid/smaps") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
Completed in 526 milliseconds