Searched +hist:651 +hist:fb419 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/fs/btrfs/ | ||
| H A D | subpage.h | diff 651fb419 Tue Aug 17 03:38:50 MDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: make btrfs_alloc_subpage() return btrfs_subpage directly The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty awful. Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call succeeded. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> diff 651fb419 Tue Aug 17 03:38:50 MDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: make btrfs_alloc_subpage() return btrfs_subpage directly The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty awful. Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call succeeded. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> |
| H A D | subpage.c | diff 651fb419 Tue Aug 17 03:38:50 MDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: make btrfs_alloc_subpage() return btrfs_subpage directly The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty awful. Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call succeeded. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> diff 651fb419 Tue Aug 17 03:38:50 MDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: make btrfs_alloc_subpage() return btrfs_subpage directly The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty awful. Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call succeeded. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> |
| H A D | extent_io.c | diff 651fb419 Tue Aug 17 03:38:50 MDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: make btrfs_alloc_subpage() return btrfs_subpage directly The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty awful. Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call succeeded. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> diff 651fb419 Tue Aug 17 03:38:50 MDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: make btrfs_alloc_subpage() return btrfs_subpage directly The existing calling convention of btrfs_alloc_subpage() is pretty awful. Change it to a more common pattern by returning struct btrfs_subpage directly and let the caller to determine if the call succeeded. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> |
Completed in 533 milliseconds