Searched +hist:3 +hist:f9a7a13 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/include/linux/ | ||
| H A D | pci-ats.h | diff 3f9a7a13 Thu Jul 23 16:37:29 MDT 2020 Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> PCI/ATS: Add pci_pri_supported() to check device or associated PF For SR-IOV, the PF PRI is shared between the PF and any associated VFs, and the PRI Capability is allowed for PFs but not for VFs. Searching for the PRI Capability on a VF always fails, even if its associated PF supports PRI. Add pci_pri_supported() to check whether device or its associated PF supports PRI. [bhelgaas: commit log, avoid "!!"] Fixes: b16d0cb9e2fc ("iommu/vt-d: Always enable PASID/PRI PCI capabilities before ATS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595543849-19692-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+ diff 3f9a7a13 Thu Jul 23 16:37:29 MDT 2020 Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> PCI/ATS: Add pci_pri_supported() to check device or associated PF For SR-IOV, the PF PRI is shared between the PF and any associated VFs, and the PRI Capability is allowed for PFs but not for VFs. Searching for the PRI Capability on a VF always fails, even if its associated PF supports PRI. Add pci_pri_supported() to check whether device or its associated PF supports PRI. [bhelgaas: commit log, avoid "!!"] Fixes: b16d0cb9e2fc ("iommu/vt-d: Always enable PASID/PRI PCI capabilities before ATS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595543849-19692-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+ diff b2441318 Wed Nov 01 08:07:57 MDT 2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> diff b2441318 Wed Nov 01 08:07:57 MDT 2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> diff b2441318 Wed Nov 01 08:07:57 MDT 2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> diff b2441318 Wed Nov 01 08:07:57 MDT 2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> diff b2441318 Wed Nov 01 08:07:57 MDT 2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> diff b2441318 Wed Nov 01 08:07:57 MDT 2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
| /linux-master/drivers/pci/ | ||
| H A D | ats.c | diff 8c09e896 Mon Jul 12 20:54:34 MDT 2021 Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> PCI: Allow PASID on fake PCIe devices without TLP prefixes Some systems, e.g., HiSilicon KunPeng920 and KunPeng930, have devices that appear as PCI but are actually on the AMBA bus. Some of these fake PCI devices support a PASID-like feature and they do have a working PASID capability even though they do not use the PCIe Transport Layer Protocol and do not support TLP prefixes. Add a pasid_no_tlp bit for this "PASID works without TLP prefixes" case and update pci_enable_pasid() so it can enable PASID on these devices. Set this bit for HiSilicon KunPeng920 and KunPeng930. [bhelgaas: squashed, commit log] Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1626144876-11352-2-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1626144876-11352-3-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> diff 43395d9e Wed Mar 10 17:17:17 MST 2021 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com> PCI: Fix kernel-doc errors Fix kernel-doc formatting errors, function names that don't match the doc, and some missing parameter documentation. These are reported by: make W=1 drivers/pci/ No functional change intended. [bhelgaas: squashed into one patch since this only changes comments] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-1-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-2-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-3-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-4-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-5-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-6-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-7-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311001724.423356-8-kw@linux.com Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> diff 9b41d19a Wed Jul 29 14:12:19 MDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> PCI: Fix kerneldoc warnings Fix kerneldoc warnings, e.g., $ make W=1 drivers/pci/ drivers/pci/ats.c:196: warning: Function parameter or member 'pdev' not described in 'pci_enable_pri' drivers/pci/ats.c:196: warning: Function parameter or member 'reqs' not described in 'pci_enable_pri' ... Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200729201224.26799-2-krzk@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200729201224.26799-3-krzk@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200729201224.26799-4-krzk@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200729201224.26799-5-krzk@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200729201224.26799-6-krzk@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200729201224.26799-7-krzk@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> diff 3f9a7a13 Thu Jul 23 16:37:29 MDT 2020 Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> PCI/ATS: Add pci_pri_supported() to check device or associated PF For SR-IOV, the PF PRI is shared between the PF and any associated VFs, and the PRI Capability is allowed for PFs but not for VFs. Searching for the PRI Capability on a VF always fails, even if its associated PF supports PRI. Add pci_pri_supported() to check whether device or its associated PF supports PRI. [bhelgaas: commit log, avoid "!!"] Fixes: b16d0cb9e2fc ("iommu/vt-d: Always enable PASID/PRI PCI capabilities before ATS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595543849-19692-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+ diff 3f9a7a13 Thu Jul 23 16:37:29 MDT 2020 Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> PCI/ATS: Add pci_pri_supported() to check device or associated PF For SR-IOV, the PF PRI is shared between the PF and any associated VFs, and the PRI Capability is allowed for PFs but not for VFs. Searching for the PRI Capability on a VF always fails, even if its associated PF supports PRI. Add pci_pri_supported() to check whether device or its associated PF supports PRI. [bhelgaas: commit log, avoid "!!"] Fixes: b16d0cb9e2fc ("iommu/vt-d: Always enable PASID/PRI PCI capabilities before ATS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595543849-19692-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+ diff 3ad62192 Thu Sep 05 13:31:44 MDT 2019 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> PCI/ATS: Disable PF/VF ATS service independently Previously we didn't disable the PF ATS until all associated VFs had disabled it. But per PCIe spec r5.0, sec 9.3.7.8, the ATS Capability in VFs and associated PFs may be enabled independently. Leaving ATS enabled in the PF unnecessarily may have power and performance impacts. Remove this dependency logic in the ATS enable/disable code. [bhelgaas: commit log] Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8163ab8fa66afd2cba514ae95d29ab12104781aa.1567029860.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905193146.90250-4-helgaas@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> diff 2b0ae7cc Thu Sep 05 13:31:43 MDT 2019 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> PCI/ATS: Handle sharing of PF PASID Capability with all VFs Per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.7.14, if a PF implements the PASID Capability, the PF PASID configuration is shared by its VFs. VFs must not implement their own PASID Capability. Since VFs don't have a PASID Capability, pci_enable_pasid() always failed, which caused IOMMU setup to fail. Update the PASID interfaces so for VFs they reflect the state of the PF PASID. [bhelgaas: rebase without pasid_cap caching, commit log] Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8ba1ac192e4ac737508b6ac15002158e176bab91.1567029860.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905193146.90250-3-helgaas@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> diff 3c765399 Fri Jul 17 14:30:26 MDT 2015 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> PCI: Rationalize pci_ats_queue_depth() error checking We previously returned -ENODEV for devices that don't support ATS (except that we always returned 0 for VFs, whether or not they support ATS). For consistency, always return -EINVAL (not -ENODEV) if the device doesn't support ATS. Return zero for VFs that support ATS. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> |
| /linux-master/drivers/iommu/intel/ | ||
| H A D | iommu.c | diff 89436f4f Wed Apr 10 21:07:44 MDT 2024 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Fix WARN_ON in iommu probe path Commit 1a75cc710b95 ("iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices") adds all devices probed by the iommu driver in a rbtree indexed by the source ID of each device. It assumes that each device has a unique source ID. This assumption is incorrect and the VT-d spec doesn't state this requirement either. The reason for using a rbtree to track devices is to look up the device with PCI bus and devfunc in the paths of handling ATS invalidation time out error and the PRI I/O page faults. Both are PCI ATS feature related. Only track the devices that have PCI ATS capabilities in the rbtree to avoid unnecessary WARN_ON in the iommu probe path. Otherwise, on some platforms below kernel splat will be displayed and the iommu probe results in failure. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 166 at drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:158 intel_iommu_probe_device+0x319/0xd90 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x7e/0x180 ? intel_iommu_probe_device+0x319/0xd90 ? report_bug+0x1f8/0x200 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? intel_iommu_probe_device+0x319/0xd90 ? debug_mutex_init+0x37/0x50 __iommu_probe_device+0xf2/0x4f0 iommu_probe_device+0x22/0x70 iommu_bus_notifier+0x1e/0x40 notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x150 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x42/0x60 bus_notify+0x2f/0x50 device_add+0x5ed/0x7e0 platform_device_add+0xf5/0x240 mfd_add_devices+0x3f9/0x500 ? preempt_count_add+0x4c/0xa0 ? up_write+0xa2/0x1b0 ? __debugfs_create_file+0xe3/0x150 intel_lpss_probe+0x49f/0x5b0 ? pci_conf1_write+0xa3/0xf0 intel_lpss_pci_probe+0xcf/0x110 [intel_lpss_pci] pci_device_probe+0x95/0x120 really_probe+0xd9/0x370 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x150 driver_probe_device+0x19/0xa0 __driver_attach+0xb6/0x180 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 bus_for_each_dev+0x77/0xd0 bus_add_driver+0x114/0x210 driver_register+0x5b/0x110 ? __pfx_intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [intel_lpss_pci] do_one_initcall+0x57/0x2b0 ? kmalloc_trace+0x21e/0x280 ? do_init_module+0x1e/0x210 do_init_module+0x5f/0x210 load_module+0x1d37/0x1fc0 ? init_module_from_file+0x86/0xd0 init_module_from_file+0x86/0xd0 idempotent_init_module+0x17c/0x230 __x64_sys_finit_module+0x56/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79 Fixes: 1a75cc710b95 ("iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10689 Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240407011429.136282-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff 81e921fd Tue Mar 05 05:21:18 MST 2024 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Fix NULL domain on device release In the kdump kernel, the IOMMU operates in deferred_attach mode. In this mode, info->domain may not yet be assigned by the time the release_device function is called. It leads to the following crash in the crash kernel: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003c ... RIP: 0010:do_raw_spin_lock+0xa/0xa0 ... _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1b/0x30 intel_iommu_release_device+0x96/0x170 iommu_deinit_device+0x39/0xf0 __iommu_group_remove_device+0xa0/0xd0 iommu_bus_notifier+0x55/0xb0 notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0xd0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x60 bus_notify+0x34/0x50 device_del+0x269/0x3d0 pci_remove_bus_device+0x77/0x100 p2sb_bar+0xae/0x1d0 ... i801_probe+0x423/0x740 Use the release_domain mechanism to fix it. The scalable mode context entry which is not part of release domain should be cleared in release_device(). Fixes: 586081d3f6b1 ("iommu/vt-d: Remove DEFER_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO") Reported-by: Eric Badger <ebadger@purestorage.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240113181713.1817855-1-ebadger@purestorage.com Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240305013305.204605-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff def054b0 Mon Feb 26 19:14:41 MST 2024 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path The existing I/O page fault handler currently locates the PCI device by calling pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). This function searches the list of all PCI devices until the desired device is found. To improve lookup efficiency, replace it with device_rbtree_find() to search the device within the probed device rbtree. The I/O page fault is initiated by the device, which does not have any synchronization mechanism with the software to ensure that the device stays in the probed device tree. Theoretically, a device could be released by the IOMMU subsystem after device_rbtree_find() and before iopf_get_dev_fault_param(), which would cause a use-after-free problem. Add a mutex to synchronize the I/O page fault reporting path and the IOMMU release device path. This lock doesn't introduce any performance overhead, as the conflict between I/O page fault reporting and device releasing is very rare. Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240220065939.121116-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff 0455d317 Mon Feb 19 04:15:53 MST 2024 Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Add __iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() Add __iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() to do the psi iotlb flush with a DID input rather than calculating it within the helper. This is useful when flushing cache for parent domain which reuses DIDs of its nested domains. Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240208082307.15759-3-yi.l.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff 47642bdd Mon Dec 18 00:34:43 MST 2023 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Remove unused parameter of intel_pasid_setup_pass_through() The domain parameter of this helper is unused and can be deleted to avoid dead code. Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231116015048.29675-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff da37dddc Tue Nov 21 20:26:04 MST 2023 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Disable PCI ATS in legacy passthrough mode When IOMMU hardware operates in legacy mode, the TT field of the context entry determines the translation type, with three supported types (Section 9.3 Context Entry): - DMA translation without device TLB support - DMA translation with device TLB support - Passthrough mode with translated and translation requests blocked Device TLB support is absent when hardware is configured in passthrough mode. Disable the PCI ATS feature when IOMMU is configured for passthrough translation type in legacy (non-scalable) mode. Fixes: 0faa19a1515f ("iommu/vt-d: Decouple PASID & PRI enabling from SVA") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114011036.70142-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff 7d12eb2d Wed Sep 27 17:47:33 MDT 2023 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> iommu/vt-d: Use ops->blocked_domain Trivially migrate to the ops->blocked_domain for the existing global static. Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Acked-by: Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3-v2-bff223cf6409+282-dart_paging_jgg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff d87731f6 Sun Oct 15 21:28:29 MDT 2023 Jingqi Liu <Jingqi.liu@intel.com> iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Create/remove debugfs file per {device, pasid} Add a debugfs directory per pair of {device, pasid} if the mappings of its page table are created and destroyed by the iommu_map/unmap() interfaces. i.e. /sys/kernel/debug/iommu/intel/<device source id>/<pasid>. Create a debugfs file in the directory for users to dump the page table corresponding to {device, pasid}. e.g. /sys/kernel/debug/iommu/intel/0000:00:02.0/1/domain_translation_struct. For the default domain without pasid, it creates a debugfs file in the debugfs device directory for users to dump its page table. e.g. /sys/kernel/debug/iommu/intel/0000:00:02.0/domain_translation_struct. When setting a domain to a PASID of device, create a debugfs file in the pasid debugfs directory for users to dump the page table of the specified pasid. Remove the debugfs device directory of the device when releasing a device. e.g. /sys/kernel/debug/iommu/intel/0000:00:01.0 Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <Jingqi.liu@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013135811.73953-3-Jingqi.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff d3aedf94 Wed Aug 09 06:48:03 MDT 2023 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Remove rmrr check in domain attaching device path The core code now prevents devices with RMRR regions from being assigned to user space. There is no need to check for this condition in individual drivers. Remove it to avoid duplicate code. Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724060352.113458-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff 3f13f727 Tue Jun 13 20:47:04 MDT 2023 Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Remove two WARN_ON in domain_context_mapping_one() Remove the WARN_ON(did == 0) as the domain id 0 is reserved and set once the domain_ids is allocated. So iommu_init_domains will never return 0. Remove the WARN_ON(!table) as this pointer will be accessed in the following code, if empty "table" really happens, the kernel will report a NULL pointer reference warning at the first place. Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605112659.308981-3-yanfei.xu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> diff 3f13f727 Tue Jun 13 20:47:04 MDT 2023 Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> iommu/vt-d: Remove two WARN_ON in domain_context_mapping_one() Remove the WARN_ON(did == 0) as the domain id 0 is reserved and set once the domain_ids is allocated. So iommu_init_domains will never return 0. Remove the WARN_ON(!table) as this pointer will be accessed in the following code, if empty "table" really happens, the kernel will report a NULL pointer reference warning at the first place. Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605112659.308981-3-yanfei.xu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> |
Completed in 287 milliseconds