Searched +hist:2315 +hist:ffa0 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
/linux-master/include/linux/ | ||
H A D | sysctl.h | diff 2315ffa0 Fri Apr 03 04:18:02 MDT 2009 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code The ctl_name and strategy fields are unused, now that sys_sysctl is a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys. No longer looking at them in the generic code is effectively what we are doing now and provides the guarantee that during further cleanups we can just remove references to those fields and everything will work ok. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 2315ffa0 Fri Apr 03 04:18:02 MDT 2009 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code The ctl_name and strategy fields are unused, now that sys_sysctl is a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys. No longer looking at them in the generic code is effectively what we are doing now and provides the guarantee that during further cleanups we can just remove references to those fields and everything will work ok. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/fs/proc/ | ||
H A D | proc_sysctl.c | diff 2315ffa0 Fri Apr 03 04:18:02 MDT 2009 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code The ctl_name and strategy fields are unused, now that sys_sysctl is a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys. No longer looking at them in the generic code is effectively what we are doing now and provides the guarantee that during further cleanups we can just remove references to those fields and everything will work ok. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 2315ffa0 Fri Apr 03 04:18:02 MDT 2009 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code The ctl_name and strategy fields are unused, now that sys_sysctl is a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys. No longer looking at them in the generic code is effectively what we are doing now and provides the guarantee that during further cleanups we can just remove references to those fields and everything will work ok. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/kernel/ | ||
H A D | sysctl.c | diff 2315ffa0 Fri Apr 03 04:18:02 MDT 2009 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code The ctl_name and strategy fields are unused, now that sys_sysctl is a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys. No longer looking at them in the generic code is effectively what we are doing now and provides the guarantee that during further cleanups we can just remove references to those fields and everything will work ok. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 2315ffa0 Fri Apr 03 04:18:02 MDT 2009 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code The ctl_name and strategy fields are unused, now that sys_sysctl is a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys. No longer looking at them in the generic code is effectively what we are doing now and provides the guarantee that during further cleanups we can just remove references to those fields and everything will work ok. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
Completed in 523 milliseconds