Searched +hist:1 +hist:e28eed1 (Results 1 - 1 of 1) sorted by relevance

/linux-master/
H A DMakefilediff e2bad142 Wed Mar 06 03:42:22 MST 2024 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: unexport abs_srctree and abs_objtree

Commit 25b146c5b8ce ("kbuild: allow Kbuild to start from any directory")
exported abs_srctree and abs_objtree to avoid recomputation after the
sub-make. However, this approach turned out to be fragile.

Commit 5fa94ceb793e ("kbuild: set correct abs_srctree and abs_objtree
for package builds") moved them above "ifneq ($(sub_make_done),1)",
eliminating the need for exporting them.

These are only needed in the top Makefile. If an absolute path is
required in sub-directories, you can use $(abspath ) or $(realpath )
as needed.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
diff c6d9a4a9 Thu Jan 25 15:55:08 MST 2024 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Makefile: drop warn-stack-size plugin opt

Now that the minimum supported version of LLVM for building the kernel has
been bumped to 13.0.1, the inner ifeq statement is always false, as the
build will fail during the configuration stage for older LLVM versions.

This effectively reverts commit 24845dcb170e ("Makefile: LTO: have linker
check -Wframe-larger-than") and its follow up fix, commit 0236526d76b8
("Makefile: lto: Pass -warn-stack-size only on LLD < 13.0.0").

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240125-bump-min-llvm-ver-to-13-0-1-v1-2-f5ff9bda41c5@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
diff c6d9a4a9 Thu Jan 25 15:55:08 MST 2024 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Makefile: drop warn-stack-size plugin opt

Now that the minimum supported version of LLVM for building the kernel has
been bumped to 13.0.1, the inner ifeq statement is always false, as the
build will fail during the configuration stage for older LLVM versions.

This effectively reverts commit 24845dcb170e ("Makefile: LTO: have linker
check -Wframe-larger-than") and its follow up fix, commit 0236526d76b8
("Makefile: lto: Pass -warn-stack-size only on LLD < 13.0.0").

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240125-bump-min-llvm-ver-to-13-0-1-v1-2-f5ff9bda41c5@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
diff ecab4115 Fri Feb 16 17:26:37 MST 2024 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> kbuild: mark `rustc` (and others) invocations as recursive

`rustc` (like Cargo) may take advantage of the jobserver at any time
(e.g. for backend parallelism, or eventually frontend too). In the kernel,
we call `rustc` with `-Ccodegen-units=1` (and `-Zthreads` is 1 so far),
so we do not expect parallelism. However, in the upcoming Rust 1.76.0, a
warning is emitted by `rustc` [1] when it cannot connect to the jobserver
it was passed (in many cases, but not all: compiling and `--print sysroot`
do, but `--version` does not). And given GNU Make always passes
the jobserver in the environment variable (even when a line is deemed
non-recursive), `rustc` will end up complaining about it (in particular
in Make 4.3 where there is only the simple pipe jobserver style).

One solution is to remove the jobserver from `MAKEFLAGS`. However, we
can mark the lines with calls to `rustc` (and Cargo) as recursive, which
looks simpler. This is being documented as a recommendation in `rustc`
[2] and allows us to be ready for the time we may use parallelism inside
`rustc` (potentially now, if a user passes `-Zthreads`). Thus do so.

Similarly, do the same for `rustdoc` and `cargo` calls.

Finally, there is one case that the solution does not cover, which is the
`$(shell ...)` call we have. Thus, for that one, set an empty `MAKEFLAGS`
environment variable.

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515 [1]
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121564 [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217002638.57373-1-ojeda@kernel.org
[ Reworded to add link to PR documenting the recommendation. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
diff ecab4115 Fri Feb 16 17:26:37 MST 2024 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> kbuild: mark `rustc` (and others) invocations as recursive

`rustc` (like Cargo) may take advantage of the jobserver at any time
(e.g. for backend parallelism, or eventually frontend too). In the kernel,
we call `rustc` with `-Ccodegen-units=1` (and `-Zthreads` is 1 so far),
so we do not expect parallelism. However, in the upcoming Rust 1.76.0, a
warning is emitted by `rustc` [1] when it cannot connect to the jobserver
it was passed (in many cases, but not all: compiling and `--print sysroot`
do, but `--version` does not). And given GNU Make always passes
the jobserver in the environment variable (even when a line is deemed
non-recursive), `rustc` will end up complaining about it (in particular
in Make 4.3 where there is only the simple pipe jobserver style).

One solution is to remove the jobserver from `MAKEFLAGS`. However, we
can mark the lines with calls to `rustc` (and Cargo) as recursive, which
looks simpler. This is being documented as a recommendation in `rustc`
[2] and allows us to be ready for the time we may use parallelism inside
`rustc` (potentially now, if a user passes `-Zthreads`). Thus do so.

Similarly, do the same for `rustdoc` and `cargo` calls.

Finally, there is one case that the solution does not cover, which is the
`$(shell ...)` call we have. Thus, for that one, set an empty `MAKEFLAGS`
environment variable.

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515 [1]
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121564 [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217002638.57373-1-ojeda@kernel.org
[ Reworded to add link to PR documenting the recommendation. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
diff ecab4115 Fri Feb 16 17:26:37 MST 2024 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> kbuild: mark `rustc` (and others) invocations as recursive

`rustc` (like Cargo) may take advantage of the jobserver at any time
(e.g. for backend parallelism, or eventually frontend too). In the kernel,
we call `rustc` with `-Ccodegen-units=1` (and `-Zthreads` is 1 so far),
so we do not expect parallelism. However, in the upcoming Rust 1.76.0, a
warning is emitted by `rustc` [1] when it cannot connect to the jobserver
it was passed (in many cases, but not all: compiling and `--print sysroot`
do, but `--version` does not). And given GNU Make always passes
the jobserver in the environment variable (even when a line is deemed
non-recursive), `rustc` will end up complaining about it (in particular
in Make 4.3 where there is only the simple pipe jobserver style).

One solution is to remove the jobserver from `MAKEFLAGS`. However, we
can mark the lines with calls to `rustc` (and Cargo) as recursive, which
looks simpler. This is being documented as a recommendation in `rustc`
[2] and allows us to be ready for the time we may use parallelism inside
`rustc` (potentially now, if a user passes `-Zthreads`). Thus do so.

Similarly, do the same for `rustdoc` and `cargo` calls.

Finally, there is one case that the solution does not cover, which is the
`$(shell ...)` call we have. Thus, for that one, set an empty `MAKEFLAGS`
environment variable.

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515 [1]
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121564 [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217002638.57373-1-ojeda@kernel.org
[ Reworded to add link to PR documenting the recommendation. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
diff ecab4115 Fri Feb 16 17:26:37 MST 2024 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> kbuild: mark `rustc` (and others) invocations as recursive

`rustc` (like Cargo) may take advantage of the jobserver at any time
(e.g. for backend parallelism, or eventually frontend too). In the kernel,
we call `rustc` with `-Ccodegen-units=1` (and `-Zthreads` is 1 so far),
so we do not expect parallelism. However, in the upcoming Rust 1.76.0, a
warning is emitted by `rustc` [1] when it cannot connect to the jobserver
it was passed (in many cases, but not all: compiling and `--print sysroot`
do, but `--version` does not). And given GNU Make always passes
the jobserver in the environment variable (even when a line is deemed
non-recursive), `rustc` will end up complaining about it (in particular
in Make 4.3 where there is only the simple pipe jobserver style).

One solution is to remove the jobserver from `MAKEFLAGS`. However, we
can mark the lines with calls to `rustc` (and Cargo) as recursive, which
looks simpler. This is being documented as a recommendation in `rustc`
[2] and allows us to be ready for the time we may use parallelism inside
`rustc` (potentially now, if a user passes `-Zthreads`). Thus do so.

Similarly, do the same for `rustdoc` and `cargo` calls.

Finally, there is one case that the solution does not cover, which is the
`$(shell ...)` call we have. Thus, for that one, set an empty `MAKEFLAGS`
environment variable.

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515 [1]
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121564 [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217002638.57373-1-ojeda@kernel.org
[ Reworded to add link to PR documenting the recommendation. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
diff ecab4115 Fri Feb 16 17:26:37 MST 2024 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> kbuild: mark `rustc` (and others) invocations as recursive

`rustc` (like Cargo) may take advantage of the jobserver at any time
(e.g. for backend parallelism, or eventually frontend too). In the kernel,
we call `rustc` with `-Ccodegen-units=1` (and `-Zthreads` is 1 so far),
so we do not expect parallelism. However, in the upcoming Rust 1.76.0, a
warning is emitted by `rustc` [1] when it cannot connect to the jobserver
it was passed (in many cases, but not all: compiling and `--print sysroot`
do, but `--version` does not). And given GNU Make always passes
the jobserver in the environment variable (even when a line is deemed
non-recursive), `rustc` will end up complaining about it (in particular
in Make 4.3 where there is only the simple pipe jobserver style).

One solution is to remove the jobserver from `MAKEFLAGS`. However, we
can mark the lines with calls to `rustc` (and Cargo) as recursive, which
looks simpler. This is being documented as a recommendation in `rustc`
[2] and allows us to be ready for the time we may use parallelism inside
`rustc` (potentially now, if a user passes `-Zthreads`). Thus do so.

Similarly, do the same for `rustdoc` and `cargo` calls.

Finally, there is one case that the solution does not cover, which is the
`$(shell ...)` call we have. Thus, for that one, set an empty `MAKEFLAGS`
environment variable.

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515 [1]
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121564 [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217002638.57373-1-ojeda@kernel.org
[ Reworded to add link to PR documenting the recommendation. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
diff 3b9ab248 Thu Feb 01 18:31:42 MST 2024 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: use 4-space indentation when followed by conditionals

GNU Make manual [1] clearly forbids a tab at the beginning of the
conditional directive line:
"Extra spaces are allowed and ignored at the beginning of the
conditional directive line, but a tab is not allowed."

This will not work for the next release of GNU Make, hence commit
82175d1f9430 ("kbuild: Replace tabs with spaces when followed by
conditionals") replaced the inappropriate tabs with 8 spaces.

However, the 8-space indentation cannot be visually distinguished.
Linus suggested 2-4 spaces for those nested if-statements. [2]

This commit redoes the replacement with 4 spaces.

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Conditional-Syntax
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whJKZNZWsa-VNDKafS_VfY4a5dAjG-r8BZgWk_a-xSepw@mail.gmail.com/

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
diff 3b9ab248 Thu Feb 01 18:31:42 MST 2024 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> kbuild: use 4-space indentation when followed by conditionals

GNU Make manual [1] clearly forbids a tab at the beginning of the
conditional directive line:
"Extra spaces are allowed and ignored at the beginning of the
conditional directive line, but a tab is not allowed."

This will not work for the next release of GNU Make, hence commit
82175d1f9430 ("kbuild: Replace tabs with spaces when followed by
conditionals") replaced the inappropriate tabs with 8 spaces.

However, the 8-space indentation cannot be visually distinguished.
Linus suggested 2-4 spaces for those nested if-statements. [2]

This commit redoes the replacement with 4 spaces.

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Conditional-Syntax
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whJKZNZWsa-VNDKafS_VfY4a5dAjG-r8BZgWk_a-xSepw@mail.gmail.com/

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

Completed in 1108 milliseconds