//===-- InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp -----------------------*- C++ -*-===// // // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // Implements a class that is able to define some instructions as "special" // (e.g. as having implicit control flow, or writing memory, or having another // interesting property) and then efficiently answers queries of the types: // 1. Are there any special instructions in the block of interest? // 2. Return first of the special instructions in the given block; // 3. Check if the given instruction is preceeded by the first special // instruction in the same block. // The class provides caching that allows to answer these queries quickly. The // user must make sure that the cached data is invalidated properly whenever // a content of some tracked block is changed. //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionPrecedenceTracking.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" #include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h" #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" using namespace llvm; #ifndef NDEBUG static cl::opt ExpensiveAsserts( "ipt-expensive-asserts", cl::desc("Perform expensive assert validation on every query to Instruction" " Precedence Tracking"), cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); #endif const Instruction *InstructionPrecedenceTracking::getFirstSpecialInstruction( const BasicBlock *BB) { #ifndef NDEBUG // If there is a bug connected to invalid cache, turn on ExpensiveAsserts to // catch this situation as early as possible. if (ExpensiveAsserts) validateAll(); else validate(BB); #endif if (FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB) == FirstSpecialInsts.end()) { fill(BB); assert(FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB) != FirstSpecialInsts.end() && "Must be!"); } return FirstSpecialInsts[BB]; } bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::hasSpecialInstructions( const BasicBlock *BB) { return getFirstSpecialInstruction(BB) != nullptr; } bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::isPreceededBySpecialInstruction( const Instruction *Insn) { const Instruction *MaybeFirstSpecial = getFirstSpecialInstruction(Insn->getParent()); return MaybeFirstSpecial && OI.dominates(MaybeFirstSpecial, Insn); } void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::fill(const BasicBlock *BB) { FirstSpecialInsts.erase(BB); for (auto &I : *BB) if (isSpecialInstruction(&I)) { FirstSpecialInsts[BB] = &I; return; } // Mark this block as having no special instructions. FirstSpecialInsts[BB] = nullptr; } #ifndef NDEBUG void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validate(const BasicBlock *BB) const { auto It = FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB); // Bail if we don't have anything cached for this block. if (It == FirstSpecialInsts.end()) return; for (const Instruction &Insn : *BB) if (isSpecialInstruction(&Insn)) { assert(It->second == &Insn && "Cached first special instruction is wrong!"); return; } assert(It->second == nullptr && "Block is marked as having special instructions but in fact it has " "none!"); } void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validateAll() const { // Check that for every known block the cached value is correct. for (auto &It : FirstSpecialInsts) validate(It.first); } #endif void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::insertInstructionTo(const Instruction *Inst, const BasicBlock *BB) { if (isSpecialInstruction(Inst)) FirstSpecialInsts.erase(BB); OI.invalidateBlock(BB); } void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::removeInstruction(const Instruction *Inst) { if (isSpecialInstruction(Inst)) FirstSpecialInsts.erase(Inst->getParent()); OI.invalidateBlock(Inst->getParent()); } void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::clear() { for (auto It : FirstSpecialInsts) OI.invalidateBlock(It.first); FirstSpecialInsts.clear(); #ifndef NDEBUG // The map should be valid after clearing (at least empty). validateAll(); #endif } bool ImplicitControlFlowTracking::isSpecialInstruction( const Instruction *Insn) const { // If a block's instruction doesn't always pass the control to its successor // instruction, mark the block as having implicit control flow. We use them // to avoid wrong assumptions of sort "if A is executed and B post-dominates // A, then B is also executed". This is not true is there is an implicit // control flow instruction (e.g. a guard) between them. // // TODO: Currently, isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns false // for volatile stores and loads because they can trap. The discussion on // whether or not it is correct is still ongoing. We might want to get rid // of this logic in the future. Anyways, trapping instructions shouldn't // introduce implicit control flow, so we explicitly allow them here. This // must be removed once isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is fixed. if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor(Insn)) return false; if (isa(Insn)) { assert(cast(Insn)->isVolatile() && "Non-volatile load should transfer execution to successor!"); return false; } if (isa(Insn)) { assert(cast(Insn)->isVolatile() && "Non-volatile store should transfer execution to successor!"); return false; } return true; } bool MemoryWriteTracking::isSpecialInstruction( const Instruction *Insn) const { using namespace PatternMatch; if (match(Insn, m_Intrinsic())) return false; return Insn->mayWriteToMemory(); }