Lines Matching defs:second
1060 while in the second case, `C<int>::D' is a primary template
1610 second is an explicit specialization, and the
2222 member function, whilst the second line specializes "f" which
5000 The second declaration is OK because `T*' uses the template
6784 unify_inconsistency (bool explain_p, tree parm, tree first, tree second)
6791 parm, first, second);
6795 "%qE (%qE and %qE)", parm, first, second);
9456 and of the former PTR. Omitting the second argument is equivalent
9604 incomplete type (finish_template_type), and the second type during the
9642 an implicit typename for the second A. Deal with it. */
24433 specialization. PAT2 is similar, but for the second template.
24436 -1 if the second is more specialized; 0 if neither is more
25035 the first instantiation was `extern' and the second is not,
25189 instantiation was `extern'. If EXTERN_P then the second is.
25259 first parameter, and the wrong type for the second. So, when we go
27922 expression, there are special rules if the second or third