ulib/tftp/tftp-test.cpp

111     EXPECT_EQ(msg->opcode, htons(OPCODE_WRQ), "opcode should be 2 (WRQ)");
118     EXPECT_EQ(msg->opcode, htons(OPCODE_RRQ), "opcode should be 1 (RRQ)");
292 bool verify_response_opcode(const test_state& ts, uint16_t opcode) {
295     // The upper byte of the opcode is ignored
296     EXPECT_EQ(ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, opcode, "bad opcode");
735     // The upper byte of the opcode is ignored
736     EXPECT_EQ(OPCODE_DATA, ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, "bad opcode");
1265     EXPECT_EQ(ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, OPCODE_ACK, "bad opcode");
1266     // The opcode prefix should have been advanced when we saw a dropped block
1267     EXPECT_EQ((ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff00) >> 8, 1, "bad opcode prefix");
1272     // Verify with the opcode prefix disabled
1278     EXPECT_EQ(ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, OPCODE_ACK, "bad opcode");
1279     EXPECT_EQ((ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff00) >> 8, 0, "bad opcode prefix");
1353     EXPECT_EQ(ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, OPCODE_ACK, "bad opcode");
1355     EXPECT_EQ((ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff00) >> 8, 1, "bad opcode prefix");
1704     unsigned int opcode = data_buf[0] << 8 | data_buf[1];
1705     EXPECT_EQ(0x0003, opcode, "incorrect DATA packet opcode");
1776     unsigned int opcode = htons(msg->opcode);
1777     EXPECT_EQ(OPCODE_DATA, opcode, "incorrect DATA packet opcode");
1783     ack_msg.opcode = htons(OPCODE_ACK);
1799     EXPECT_EQ(OPCODE_DATA, ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, "incorrect DATA packet opcode");
1801     EXPECT_EQ(1, (ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff00) >> 8, "incorrect opcode prefix");
1806     // Try again, this time disabling opcode prefixes
1818     EXPECT_EQ(OPCODE_DATA, ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff, "incorrect DATA packet opcode");
1819     EXPECT_EQ(0, (ntohs(msg->opcode) & 0xff00) >> 8, "incorrect opcode prefix");
1871     EXPECT_EQ(msg->opcode, htons(OPCODE_ERROR));