tests/xnu_quick_test/content_protection_test.c

14    need to manipulate the passcode) has the unfortunate effect of link xnu_quick_test
191 	/* We fail if a passcode already exists, and the methods being used to lock/unlock
219 int unlock_device(char * passcode)
229 	if ((passcode == NULL) || ((input_struct_count = strnlen(passcode, CPT_MAX_PASS_LEN)) == CPT_MAX_PASS_LEN))
231 		passcode = "";
235 	result = apple_key_store(kAppleKeyStoreKeyBagUnlock, inputs, input_count, passcode, input_struct_count, NULL, NULL);
238 	if ((passcode == NULL) || (strnlen(passcode, CPT_MAX_PASS_LEN) == CPT_MAX_PASS_LEN))
240 		passcode = "";
243 	char * const keystorectl_args[] = {keystorectl_path, "unlock", passcode, NULL};
255 	/* If we're entitled, we can set the passcode ourselves. */
292 	/* If we aren't entitled, we'll need to use keystorectl to set the passcode. */
310 int clear_passcode(char * passcode)
312 	/* For the moment, this will set the passcode to the empty string (a known value);
316 	result = set_passcode(NULL, passcode);
327 	   set a passcode and then reboot the device in order to test this; this function
335 /* If the device has a passcode when we want to test it, things are going to go wrong.
336    As such, we'll assume the device never has a passcode.
365 	char * passcode = "IAmASecurePassword";
403 	/* If we support content protection, we'll need to be able to set the passcode. */
408 		printf("%s, line %d: the device appears to have a passcode.\n",
413 	if (set_passcode(passcode, NULL))
415 		printf("%s, line %d: failed to set a new passcode.\n",
470 	if (unlock_device(passcode))
578 	if (unlock_device(passcode))
707 	if (unlock_device(passcode))
790 	if (unlock_device(passcode))
834 	if (unlock_device(passcode))
908 	/* Try to unlock the device (no ramifications if it isn't locked when we try) and remove the passcode. */
909 	if (unlock_device(passcode))
914 	if (clear_passcode(passcode))
916 		printf("WARNING: failed to clear the passcode.\n");