Lines Matching refs:valid
882 (vfsattr.f_capabilities.valid[VOL_CAPABILITIES_INTERFACES] & VOL_CAP_INT_EXTENDED_ATTR)) {
887 (vfsattr.f_capabilities.valid[VOL_CAPABILITIES_INTERFACES] & VOL_CAP_INT_NAMEDSTREAMS)) {
893 (vfsattr.f_capabilities.valid[VOL_CAPABILITIES_FORMAT] & VOL_CAP_FMT_PATH_FROM_ID)) {
4088 // instance of the link is no longer valid. this will
4350 * see, the valid values for the offset ad_name_offset will be
4381 * Validate parameters; if valid, copy the descriptor array and string
4442 * It is also an error for any valid entry to point
4457 /* This is not valid for the first entry */
4493 * at least appear to contain valid data.
5870 /* Check that the flags are valid. */
6022 * Claim: this check will never reject a valid rename.
6044 * being valid. If so, simply re-drive the rename call from the
6505 * it will fail in a spurious manner. Need to figure out if this is valid behavior.
6683 * I do not think that check was valid, because if we retry
7259 /* Believe it or not, uap->options only has 32-bits of valid