#
c22bdd28 |
|
28-Sep-2021 |
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> |
selftests/bpf: Switch SEC("classifier*") usage to a strict SEC("tc") Convert all SEC("classifier*") uses to a new and strict SEC("tc") section name. In reference_tracking selftests switch from ambiguous searching by program title (section name) to non-ambiguous searching by name in some selftests, getting closer to completely removing bpf_object__find_program_by_title(). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-4-andrii@kernel.org
|
#
256eab48 |
|
06-May-2021 |
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> |
selftests/bpf: Stop using static variables for passing data to/from user-space In preparation of skipping emitting static variables in BPF skeletons, switch all current selftests uses of static variables to pass data between BPF and user-space to use global variables. All non-read-only `static volatile` variables become just plain global variables by dropping `static volatile` part. Read-only `static volatile const` variables, though, still require `volatile` modifier, otherwise compiler will ignore whatever values are set from user-space. Few static linker tests are using name-conflicting static variables to validate that static linker still properly handles static variables and doesn't trip up on name conflicts. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210507054119.270888-4-andrii@kernel.org
|
#
faef26fa |
|
30-Sep-2020 |
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
bpf, selftests: Use bpf_tail_call_static where appropriate For those locations where we use an immediate tail call map index use the newly added bpf_tail_call_static() helper. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3cfb2b799a62d22c6e7ae5897c23940bdcc24cbc.1601477936.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
|
#
3e689141 |
|
20-Jan-2020 |
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> |
selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted. To not break the build, keep the old include path until everything has been changed to the new one; a subsequent patch will remove that. Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560568.1683545.9649335788846513446.stgit@toke.dk
|
#
79d49ba0 |
|
22-Nov-2019 |
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and different programs. # ./test_progs -n 45 #45/1 tailcall_1:OK #45/2 tailcall_2:OK #45/3 tailcall_3:OK #45/4 tailcall_4:OK #45/5 tailcall_5:OK #45 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that it matches expectations. Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail call tests: # ./test_verifier [...] Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
|