lockdep/selftests: Use SBRM APIs for wait context tests

The "__cleanup__" attribute is already used for wait context tests, so
using it for locking tests has already been proven working. Now since
SBRM APIs are merged, let's use these APIs instead of a local guard
framework. This also helps testing SBRM APIs.

Note that originally the tests don't rely on the cleanup ordering of
two variables in the same scope, but since now it's something we'd like
to assume and rely on[1], drop the extra scope in inner_in_outer()
function. Again this gives us another opportunity to test the compiler
behavior.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whEsr6fuVSdsoNPokLR2fZiGuo_hCLyrS-LCw7hT_N7cQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230715235257.110325-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com

lockdep/selftests: Adapt ww-tests for PREEMPT_RT

The ww-mutex selftest operates directly on ww_mutex::base and assumes
its type is struct mutex. This isn't true on PREEMPT_RT which turns the
mutex into a rtmutex.

Add a ww_mutex_base_ abstraction which maps to the relevant mutex_ or
rt_mutex_ function.
Change the CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES ifdef to DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES. The latter is
true for the MUTEX and RTMUTEX implementation of WW-MUTEX. The
assignment is required in order to pass the tests.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-10-bigeasy@linutronix.de

lockdep/selftests: Skip the softirq related tests on PREEMPT_RT

The softirq context on PREEMPT_RT is different compared to !PREEMPT_RT.
As such lockdep_softirq_enter() is a nop and the all the "softirq safe"
tests fail on PREEMPT_RT because there is no difference.

Skip the softirq context tests on PREEMPT_RT.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de

lockdep/selftests: Unbalanced migrate_disable() & rcu_read_lock().

The tests with unbalanced lock() + unlock() operation leave a modified
preemption counter behind which is then reset to its original value
after the test.

The spin_lock() function on PREEMPT_RT does not include a
preempt_disable() statement but migrate_disable() and read_rcu_lock().
As a consequence both counter never get back to their original value
and the system explodes later after the selftest. In the
double-unlock case on PREEMPT_RT, the migrate_disable() and RCU code
will trigger a warning which should be avoided. These counter should
not be decremented below their initial value.

Save both counters and bring them back to their original value after
the test. In the double-unlock case, increment both counter in
advance to they become balanced after the double unlock.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de

lockdep/selftests: Avoid using local_lock_{acquire|release}().

The local_lock related functions
local_lock_acquire()
local_lock_release()

are part of the internal implementation and should be avoided.
Define the lock as DEFINE_PER_CPU so the normal local_lock() function
can be used.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de

kernel/locking: Add context to ww_mutex_trylock()

i915 will soon gain an eviction path that trylock a whole lot of locks
for eviction, getting dmesg failures like below:

BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
depth: 48 max: 48!
48 locks held by i915_selftest/5776:
#0: ffff888101a79240 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x88/0x160
#1: ffffc900009778c0 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.63+0x39/0x1b0 [i915]
#2: ffff88800cf74de8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.63+0x5f/0x1b0 [i915]
#3: ffff88810c7f9e38 (&vm->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin_ww+0x1c4/0x9d0 [i915]
#4: ffff88810bad5768 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
#5: ffff88810bad60e8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
...
#46: ffff88811964d768 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
#47: ffff88811964e0e8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_gem_evict_something+0x110/0x860 [i915]
INFO: lockdep is turned off.

Fixing eviction to nest into ww_class_acquire is a high priority, but
it requires a rework of the entire driver, which can only be done one
step at a time.

As an intermediate solution, add an acquire context to
ww_mutex_trylock, which allows us to do proper nesting annotations on
the trylocks, making the above lockdep splat disappear.

This is also useful in regulator_lock_nested, which may avoid dropping
regulator_nesting_mutex in the uncontended path, so use it there.

TTM may be another user for this, where we could lock a buffer in a
fastpath with list locks held, without dropping all locks we hold.

[peterz: rework actual ww_mutex_trylock() implementations]
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YUBGPdDDjKlxAuXJ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

lockdep/selftest: Remove wait-type RCU_CALLBACK tests

The problem is that rcu_callback_map doesn't have wait_types defined,
and doing so would make it indistinguishable from SOFTIRQ in any case.
Remove it.

Fixes: 9271a40d2a14 ("lockdep/selftest: Add wait context selftests")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617190313.384290291@infradead.org

lockdep/selftests: Fix selftests vs PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING

When PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y many of the selftests FAILED because
HARDIRQ context is out-of-bounds for spinlocks. Instead make the
default hardware context the threaded hardirq context, which preserves
the old locking rules.

The wait-type specific locking selftests will have a non-threaded
HARDIRQ variant.

Fixes: de8f5e4f2dc1 ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617190313.322096283@infradead.org

locking/selftests: Add a selftest for check_irq_usage()

Johannes Berg reported a lockdep problem which could be reproduced by
the special test case introduced in this patch, so add it.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com

locking/selftests: Add local_lock inversion tests

Test the local_lock_t inversion scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

locking/selftests: More granular debug_locks_verbose

Showing all tests all the time is tiresome.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

lockdep/selftest: Add wait context selftests

These tests are added for two purposes:

* Test the implementation of wait context checks and related
annotations.

* Semi-document the rules for wait context nesting when
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y.

The test cases are only avaible for PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y, as wait
context checking makes more sense for that configuration.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201208103112.2838119-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com

locking/selftests: add testcases for fs_reclaim

Since I butchered this I figured better to make sure we have testcases for
this now. Since we only have a locking context for __GFP_FS that's the
only thing we're testing right now.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201125162532.1299794-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Thomas Hellström (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

lockdep/selftest: Add spin_nest_lock test

Add a self test case to test the behavior for the following case:

lock(A);
lock_nest_lock(C1, A);
lock(B);
lock_nest_lock(C2, A);

This is a reproducer for a problem[1] reported by Chris Wilson, and is
helpful to prevent this.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/160390684819.31966.12048967113267928793@build.alporthouse.com/

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com

lockdep/selftests: Fix PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING

The selftest nests rwlock_t inside raw_spinlock_t, this is invalid.

Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

lockdep/selftest: Introduce recursion3

Add a test case shows that USED_IN_*_READ and ENABLE_*_READ can cause
deadlock too.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-20-boqun.feng@gmail.com

locking/selftest: Add test cases for queued_read_lock()

Add two self test cases for the following case:

P0: P1: P2:

<in irq handler>
spin_lock_irq(&slock) read_lock(&rwlock)
write_lock_irq(&rwlock)
read_lock(&rwlock) spin_lock(&slock)

, which is a deadlock, as the read_lock() on P0 cannot get the lock
because of the fairness.

P0: P1: P2:

<in irq handler>
spin_lock(&slock) read_lock(&rwlock)
write_lock(&rwlock)
read_lock(&rwlock) spin_lock_irq(&slock)

, which is not a deadlock, as the read_lock() on P0 can get the lock
because it could use the unfair fastpass.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-19-boqun.feng@gmail.com

Revert "locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests"

This reverts commit d82fed75294229abc9d757f08a4817febae6c4f4.

Since we now could handle mixed read-write deadlock detection well, the
self tests could be detected as expected, no need to use this
work-around.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-18-boqun.feng@gmail.com

lockdep/selftest: Add more recursive read related test cases

Add those four test cases:

1. X --(ER)--> Y --(ER)--> Z --(ER)--> X is deadlock.

2. X --(EN)--> Y --(SR)--> Z --(ER)--> X is deadlock.

3. X --(EN)--> Y --(SR)--> Z --(SN)--> X is not deadlock.

4. X --(ER)--> Y --(SR)--> Z --(EN)--> X is not deadlock.

Those self testcases are valuable for the development of supporting
recursive read related deadlock detection.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-17-boqun.feng@gmail.com

lockdep/selftest: Unleash irq_read_recursion2 and add more

Now since we can handle recursive read related irq inversion deadlocks
correctly, uncomment the irq_read_recursion2 and add more testcases.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-16-boqun.feng@gmail.com

lockdep/selftest: Add a R-L/L-W test case specific to chain cache behavior

As our chain cache doesn't differ read/write locks, so even we can
detect a read-lock/lock-write deadlock in check_noncircular(), we can
still be fooled if a read-lock/lock-read case(which is not a deadlock)
comes first.

So introduce this test case to test specific to the chain cache behavior
on detecting recursive read lock related deadlocks.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-14-boqun.feng@gmail.com

locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()

On the archs using QUEUED_RWLOCKS, read_lock() is not always a recursive
read lock, actually it's only recursive if in_interrupt() is true. So
change the annotation accordingly to catch more deadlocks.

Note we used to treat read_lock() as pure recursive read locks in
lib/locking-seftest.c, and this is useful, especially for the lockdep
development selftest, so we keep this via a variable to force switching
lock annotation for read_lock().

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com

locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()

Since the following commit:

b4adfe8e05f1 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release")

@nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all
lock_release() calls and friends.

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jack@suse.com
Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: jslaby@suse.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Cc: mark@fasheh.com
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: mripard@kernel.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Cc: sean@poorly.run
Cc: st@kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/lockdep: Make it easy to detect whether or not inside a selftest

The patch that frees unused lock classes will modify the behavior of
lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock() depending on whether
or not these functions are called from the context of the lockdep
selftests. Hence make it easy to detect whether or not lockdep code
is called from the context of a lockdep selftest.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-10-bvanassche@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes

The current Wound-Wait mutex algorithm is actually not Wound-Wait but
Wait-Die. Implement also Wound-Wait as a per-ww-class choice. Wound-Wait
is, contrary to Wait-Die a preemptive algorithm and is known to generate
fewer backoffs. Testing reveals that this is true if the
number of simultaneous contending transactions is small.
As the number of simultaneous contending threads increases, Wait-Wound
becomes inferior to Wait-Die in terms of elapsed time.
Possibly due to the larger number of held locks of sleeping transactions.

Update documentation and callers.

Timings using git://people.freedesktop.org/~thomash/ww_mutex_test
tag patch-18-06-15

Each thread runs 100000 batches of lock / unlock 800 ww mutexes randomly
chosen out of 100000. Four core Intel x86_64:

Algorithm #threads Rollbacks time
Wound-Wait 4 ~100 ~17s.
Wait-Die 4 ~150000 ~19s.
Wound-Wait 16 ~360000 ~109s.
Wait-Die 16 ~450000 ~82s.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Co-authored-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

locking/selftest: Avoid false BUG report

The work-around for the expected failure is providing another failure :/

Only when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y do we increment unexpected_testcase_failures,
so only then do we need to decrement, otherwise we'll end up with a negative
number and that will again trigger a BUG (printout, not crash).

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: d82fed752942 ("locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests

Commit:

e91498589746 ("locking/lockdep/selftests: Add mixed read-write ABBA tests")

adds an explicit FAILURE to the locking selftest but overlooked the
fact that this kills lockdep. Fudge the test to avoid this.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170828124245.xlo2yshxq2btgmuf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/lockdep/selftests: Add mixed read-write ABBA tests

Currently lockdep has limited support for recursive readers, add a few
mixed read-write ABBA selftests to show the extend of these
limitations.

[ 0.000000] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.000000] | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
[ 0.000000] --------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ 0.000000] mixed read-lock/lock-write ABBA: |FAILED| | ok |
[ 0.000000] mixed read-lock/lock-read ABBA: | ok | | ok |
[ 0.000000] mixed write-lock/lock-write ABBA: | ok | | ok |

This clearly illustrates the case where lockdep fails to find a
deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com
Cc: byungchul.park@lge.com
Cc: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/selftest: Add RT-mutex support

Now that RT-mutex has lockdep annotations, add them to the selftest.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/selftest: Remove the bad unlock ordering test

There is no such thing as a bad unlock order.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/selftest: Fix output since KERN_CONT changes

Since the KERN_CONT changes the locking-selftest output is messed up, eg:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-A deadlock:
ok |
ok |
ok |
ok |
ok |
ok |

Use pr_cont() to get it looking normal again:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |

Reported-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480027528-934-1-git-send-email-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/lockdep: Revert qrwlock recusive stuff

Commit f0bab73cb539 ("locking/lockdep: Restrict the use of recursive
read_lock() with qrwlock") changed lockdep to try and conform to the
qrwlock semantics which differ from the traditional rwlock semantics.

In particular qrwlock is fair outside of interrupt context, but in
interrupt context readers will ignore all fairness.

The problem modeling this is that read and write side have different
lock state (interrupts) semantics but we only have a single
representation of these. Therefore lockdep will get confused, thinking
the lock can cause interrupt lock inversions.

So revert it for now; the old rwlock semantics were already imperfectly
modeled and the qrwlock extra won't fit either.

If we want to properly fix this, I think we need to resurrect the work
by Gautham did a few years ago that split the read and write state of
locks:

http://lwn.net/Articles/332801/

FWIW the locking selftest that would've failed (and was reported by
Borislav earlier) is something like:

RL(X1); /* IRQ-ON */
LOCK(A);
UNLOCK(A);
RU(X1);

IRQ_ENTER();
RL(X1); /* IN-IRQ */
RU(X1);
IRQ_EXIT();

At which point it would report that because A is an IRQ-unsafe lock we
can suffer the following inversion:

CPU0 CPU1

lock(A)
lock(X1)
lock(A)
<IRQ>
lock(X1)

And this is 'wrong' because X1 can recurse (assuming the above lock are
in fact read-lock) but lockdep doesn't know about this.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140930132600.GA7444@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/selftest: Support queued rwlock

The queued rwlock does not support the use of recursive read-lock in
the process context. With changes in the lockdep code to check and
disallow recursive read-lock, it is also necessary for the locking
selftest to be updated to change the process context recursive read
locking results from SUCCESS to FAILURE for rwlock.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1407345722-61615-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

sched: Introduce preempt_count accessor functions

Replace the single preempt_count() 'function' that's an lvalue with
two proper functions:

preempt_count() - returns the preempt_count value as rvalue
preempt_count_set() - Allows setting the preempt-count value

Also provide preempt_count_ptr() as a convenience wrapper to implement
all modifying operations.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-orxrbycjozopqfhb4dxdkdvb@git.kernel.org
[ Fixed build failure. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

mutex: Move ww_mutex definitions to ww_mutex.h

Move the definitions for wound/wait mutexes out to a separate
header, ww_mutex.h. This reduces clutter in mutex.h, and
increases readability.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51D675DC.3000907@canonical.com
[ Tidied up the code a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking-selftests: Handle unexpected failures more strictly

When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not enabled, more tests are
expected to pass unexpectedly, but there no tests that should
start to fail that pass with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113151.4001.77963.stgit@patser
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

mutex: Add more w/w tests to test EDEADLK path handling

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113141.4001.54331.stgit@patser
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

mutex: Add more tests to lib/locking-selftest.c

None of the ww_mutex codepaths should be taken in the 'normal'
mutex calls. The easiest way to verify this is by using the
normal mutex calls, and making sure o.ctx is unmodified.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: robclark@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113130.4001.45423.stgit@patser
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

mutex: Add w/w tests to lib/locking-selftest.c

This stresses the lockdep code in some ways specifically useful
to ww_mutexes. It adds checks for most of the common locking
errors.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: robclark@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113124.4001.23186.stgit@patser
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

lockdep: Selftest: convert spinlock to raw spinlock

To make the lockdep selftest working on RT we need to convert the
spinlock tests to a raw spinlock. Otherwise we cannot run the irq
context checks. For mainline this is just annotational as spinlocks
are mapped to raw_spinlocks anyway.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1334559716-18447-2-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

lib: reduce the use of module.h wherever possible

For files only using THIS_MODULE and/or EXPORT_SYMBOL, map
them onto including export.h -- or if the file isn't even
using those, then just delete the include. Fix up any implicit
include dependencies that were being masked by module.h along
the way.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

rcu: Fix unpaired rcu_irq_enter() from locking selftests

HARDIRQ_ENTER() maps to irq_enter() which calls rcu_irq_enter().
But HARDIRQ_EXIT() maps to __irq_exit() which doesn't call
rcu_irq_exit().

So for every locking selftest that simulates hardirq disabled,
we create an imbalance in the rcu extended quiescent state
internal state.

As a result, after the first missing rcu_irq_exit(), subsequent
irqs won't exit dyntick-idle mode after leaving the interrupt
handler. This means that RCU won't see the affected CPU as being
in an extended quiescent state, resulting in long grace-period
delays (as in grace periods extending for hours).

To fix this, just use __irq_enter() to simulate the hardirq
context. This is sufficient for the locking selftests as we
don't need to exit any extended quiescent state or perform
any check that irqs normally do when they wake up from idle.

As a side effect, this patch makes it possible to restore
"rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof",
which eventually helped finding this bug.

Reported-and-tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

locking: rename trace_softirq_[enter|exit] => lockdep_softirq_[enter|exit]

Impact: cleanup

The naming clashes with upcoming softirq tracepoints, so rename the
APIs to lockdep_*().

Requested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

[PATCH] lockdep: show more details about self-test failures

Make the locking self-test failures (of 'FAILURE' type) easier to debug by
printing more information.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

[PATCH] lockdep: allow read_lock() recursion of same class

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

lockdep so far only allowed read-recursion for the same lock instance.
This is enough in the overwhelming majority of cases, but a hostap case
triggered and reported by Miles Lane relies on same-class
different-instance recursion. So we relax the restriction on read-lock
recursion.

(This change does not allow rwsem read-recursion, which is still
forbidden.)

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

[PATCH] lockdep: core

Do 'make oldconfig' and accept all the defaults for new config options -
reboot into the kernel and if everything goes well it should boot up fine and
you should have /proc/lockdep and /proc/lockdep_stats files.

Typically if the lock validator finds some problem it will print out
voluminous debug output that begins with "BUG: ..." and which syslog output
can be used by kernel developers to figure out the precise locking scenario.

What does the lock validator do? It "observes" and maps all locking rules as
they occur dynamically (as triggered by the kernel's natural use of spinlocks,
rwlocks, mutexes and rwsems). Whenever the lock validator subsystem detects a
new locking scenario, it validates this new rule against the existing set of
rules. If this new rule is consistent with the existing set of rules then the
new rule is added transparently and the kernel continues as normal. If the
new rule could create a deadlock scenario then this condition is printed out.

When determining validity of locking, all possible "deadlock scenarios" are
considered: assuming arbitrary number of CPUs, arbitrary irq context and task
context constellations, running arbitrary combinations of all the existing
locking scenarios. In a typical system this means millions of separate
scenarios. This is why we call it a "locking correctness" validator - for all
rules that are observed the lock validator proves it with mathematical
certainty that a deadlock could not occur (assuming that the lock validator
implementation itself is correct and its internal data structures are not
corrupted by some other kernel subsystem). [see more details and conditionals
of this statement in include/linux/lockdep.h and
Documentation/lockdep-design.txt]

Furthermore, this "all possible scenarios" property of the validator also
enables the finding of complex, highly unlikely multi-CPU multi-context races
via single single-context rules, increasing the likelyhood of finding bugs
drastically. In practical terms: the lock validator already found a bug in
the upstream kernel that could only occur on systems with 3 or more CPUs, and
which needed 3 very unlikely code sequences to occur at once on the 3 CPUs.
That bug was found and reported on a single-CPU system (!). So in essence a
race will be found "piecemail-wise", triggering all the necessary components
for the race, without having to reproduce the race scenario itself! In its
short existence the lock validator found and reported many bugs before they
actually caused a real deadlock.

To further increase the efficiency of the validator, the mapping is not per
"lock instance", but per "lock-class". For example, all struct inode objects
in the kernel have inode->inotify_mutex. If there are 10,000 inodes cached,
then there are 10,000 lock objects. But ->inotify_mutex is a single "lock
type", and all locking activities that occur against ->inotify_mutex are
"unified" into this single lock-class. The advantage of the lock-class
approach is that all historical ->inotify_mutex uses are mapped into a single
(and as narrow as possible) set of locking rules - regardless of how many
different tasks or inode structures it took to build this set of rules. The
set of rules persist during the lifetime of the kernel.

To see the rough magnitude of checking that the lock validator does, here's a
portion of /proc/lockdep_stats, fresh after bootup:

lock-classes: 694 [max: 2048]
direct dependencies: 1598 [max: 8192]
indirect dependencies: 17896
all direct dependencies: 16206
dependency chains: 1910 [max: 8192]
in-hardirq chains: 17
in-softirq chains: 105
in-process chains: 1065
stack-trace entries: 38761 [max: 131072]
combined max dependencies: 2033928
hardirq-safe locks: 24
hardirq-unsafe locks: 176
softirq-safe locks: 53
softirq-unsafe locks: 137
irq-safe locks: 59
irq-unsafe locks: 176

The lock validator has observed 1598 actual single-thread locking patterns,
and has validated all possible 2033928 distinct locking scenarios.

More details about the design of the lock validator can be found in
Documentation/lockdep-design.txt, which can also found at:

http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-design.txt

[bunk@stusta.de: cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

[PATCH] lockdep: locking API self tests

Introduce DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS, which uses the generic lock debugging
code's silent-failure feature to run a matrix of testcases. There are 210
testcases currently:

+-----------------------
| Locking API testsuite:
+------------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
| spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
-------------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
A-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-B-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-B-C-C-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-C-A-B-C deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-B-C-C-D-D-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-C-D-B-D-D-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
double unlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
bad unlock order: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
--------------------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
recursive read-lock: | ok | | ok |
--------------------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
non-nested unlock: ok | ok | ok | ok |
--------------------------------------+------+------+------+
hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/12: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/12: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok |
sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok |
sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/132: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/132: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/213: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/213: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/231: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/231: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/312: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/312: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/321: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/321: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/123: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/123: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/132: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/132: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/213: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/213: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/231: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/231: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/312: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/312: ok | ok | ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/321: ok | ok | ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/321: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/123: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/123: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/132: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/132: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/213: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/213: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/231: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/231: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/312: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/312: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/321: ok | ok | ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/321: ok | ok | ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/123: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/123: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/132: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/132: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/213: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/213: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/231: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/231: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/312: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/312: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/321: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/321: ok |
--------------------------------+-----+----------------
Good, all 210 testcases passed! |
--------------------------------+

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>