x86/efistub: Use 1:1 file:memory mapping for PE/COFF .compat section

The .compat section is a dummy PE section that contains the address of
the 32-bit entrypoint of the 64-bit kernel image if it is bootable from
32-bit firmware (i.e., CONFIG_EFI_MIXED=y)

This section is only 8 bytes in size and is only referenced from the
loader, and so it is placed at the end of the memory view of the image,
to avoid the need for padding it to 4k, which is required for sections
appearing in the middle of the image.

Unfortunately, this violates the PE/COFF spec, and even if most EFI
loaders will work correctly (including the Tianocore reference
implementation), PE loaders do exist that reject such images, on the
basis that both the file and memory views of the file contents should be
described by the section headers in a monotonically increasing manner
without leaving any gaps.

So reorganize the sections to avoid this issue. This results in a slight
padding overhead (< 4k) which can be avoided if desired by disabling
CONFIG_EFI_MIXED (which is only needed in rare cases these days)

Fixes: 3e3eabe26dc8 ("x86/boot: Increase section and file alignment to 4k/512")
Reported-by: Mike Beaton <mjsbeaton@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHzAAWQ6srV6LVNdmfbJhOwhBw5ZzxxZZ07aHt9oKkfYAdvuQQ%40mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

x86/boot: Increase section and file alignment to 4k/512

Align x86 with other EFI architectures, and increase the section
alignment to the EFI page size (4k), so that firmware is able to honour
the section permission attributes and map code read-only and data
non-executable.

There are a number of requirements that have to be taken into account:
- the sign tools get cranky when there are gaps between sections in the
file view of the image
- the virtual offset of each section must be aligned to the image's
section alignment
- the file offset *and size* of each section must be aligned to the
image's file alignment
- the image size must be aligned to the section alignment
- each section's virtual offset must be greater than or equal to the
size of the headers.

In order to meet all these requirements, while avoiding the need for
lots of padding to accommodate the .compat section, the latter is placed
at an arbitrary offset towards the end of the image, but aligned to the
minimum file alignment (512 bytes). The space before the .text section
is therefore distributed between the PE header, the .setup section and
the .compat section, leaving no gaps in the file coverage, making the
signing tools happy.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230915171623.655440-18-ardb@google.com

x86/boot: Drop PE/COFF .reloc section

Ancient buggy EFI loaders may have required a .reloc section to be
present at some point in time, but this has not been true for a long
time so the .reloc section can just be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230915171623.655440-16-ardb@google.com

x86/boot: Define setup size in linker script

The setup block contains the real mode startup code that is used when
booting from a legacy BIOS, along with the boot_params/setup_data that
is used by legacy x86 bootloaders to pass the command line and initial
ramdisk parameters, among other things.

The setup block also contains the PE/COFF header of the entire combined
image, which includes the compressed kernel image, the decompressor and
the EFI stub.

This PE header describes the layout of the executable image in memory,
and currently, the fact that the setup block precedes it makes it rather
fiddly to get the right values into the right place in the final image.

Let's make things a bit easier by defining the setup_size in the linker
script so it can be referenced from the asm code directly, rather than
having to rely on the build tool to calculate it. For the time being,
add 64 bytes of fixed padding for the .reloc and .compat sections - this
will be removed in a subsequent patch after the PE/COFF header has been
reorganized.

This change has no impact on the resulting bzImage binary when
configured with CONFIG_EFI_MIXED=y.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230915171623.655440-13-ardb@google.com

x86/boot: Remove the 'bugger off' message

Ancient (pre-2003) x86 kernels could boot from a floppy disk straight from
the BIOS, using a small real mode boot stub at the start of the image
where the BIOS would expect the boot record (or boot block) to appear.

Due to its limitations (kernel size < 1 MiB, no support for IDE, USB or
El Torito floppy emulation), this support was dropped, and a Linux aware
bootloader is now always required to boot the kernel from a legacy BIOS.

To smoothen this transition, the boot stub was not removed entirely, but
replaced with one that just prints an error message telling the user to
install a bootloader.

As it is unlikely that anyone doing direct floppy boot with such an
ancient kernel is going to upgrade to v6.5+ and expect that this boot
method still works, printing this message is kind of pointless, and so
it should be possible to remove the logic that emits it.

Let's free up this space so it can be used to expand the PE header in a
subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912090051.4014114-21-ardb@google.com

x86/boot: Add .text.* to setup.ld

GCC puts the main function into .text.startup when compiled with -Os (or
-O2). This results in arch/x86/boot/main.c having a .text.startup
section which is currently not included explicitly in the linker script
setup.ld in the same directory.

The BFD linker places this orphan section immediately after .text, so
this still works. However, LLD git, since [1], is choosing to place it
immediately after the .bstext section instead (this is the first code
section). This plays havoc with the section layout that setup.elf
requires to create the setup header, for eg on 64-bit:

LD arch/x86/boot/setup.elf
ld.lld: error: section .text.startup file range overlaps with .header
>>> .text.startup range is [0x200040, 0x2001FE]
>>> .header range is [0x2001EF, 0x20026B]

ld.lld: error: section .header file range overlaps with .bsdata
>>> .header range is [0x2001EF, 0x20026B]
>>> .bsdata range is [0x2001FF, 0x200398]

ld.lld: error: section .bsdata file range overlaps with .entrytext
>>> .bsdata range is [0x2001FF, 0x200398]
>>> .entrytext range is [0x20026C, 0x2002D3]

ld.lld: error: section .text.startup virtual address range overlaps
with .header
>>> .text.startup range is [0x40, 0x1FE]
>>> .header range is [0x1EF, 0x26B]

ld.lld: error: section .header virtual address range overlaps with
.bsdata
>>> .header range is [0x1EF, 0x26B]
>>> .bsdata range is [0x1FF, 0x398]

ld.lld: error: section .bsdata virtual address range overlaps with
.entrytext
>>> .bsdata range is [0x1FF, 0x398]
>>> .entrytext range is [0x26C, 0x2D3]

ld.lld: error: section .text.startup load address range overlaps with
.header
>>> .text.startup range is [0x40, 0x1FE]
>>> .header range is [0x1EF, 0x26B]

ld.lld: error: section .header load address range overlaps with
.bsdata
>>> .header range is [0x1EF, 0x26B]
>>> .bsdata range is [0x1FF, 0x398]

ld.lld: error: section .bsdata load address range overlaps with
.entrytext
>>> .bsdata range is [0x1FF, 0x398]
>>> .entrytext range is [0x26C, 0x2D3]

Add .text.* to the .text output section to fix this, and also prevent
any future surprises if the compiler decides to create other such
sections.

[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D75225

Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200731230820.1742553-5-keescook@chromium.org

x86/vmlinux: Drop unneeded linker script discard of .eh_frame

Now that .eh_frame sections for the files in setup.elf and realmode.elf
are not generated anymore, the linker scripts don't need the special
output section name /DISCARD/ any more.

Remove the one in the main kernel linker script as well, since there are
no .eh_frame sections already, and fix up a comment referencing .eh_frame.

Update the comment in asm/dwarf2.h referring to .eh_frame so it continues
to make sense, as well as being more specific.

[ bp: Touch up commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200224232129.597160-3-nivedita@alum.mit.edu

x86/boot: Discard .eh_frame sections

When using GCC as compiler and LLVM's lld as linker, linking setup.elf
fails:

LD arch/x86/boot/setup.elf
ld.lld: error: init sections too big!

This happens because GCC generates .eh_frame sections for most of the
files in that directory, then ld.lld places the merged section before
__end_init, triggering an assert in the linker script.

Fix this by discarding the .eh_frame sections, as suggested by Boris.
The kernel proper linker script discards them too.

[ bp: Going back in history, 64-bit kernel proper has been discarding
.eh_frame since 2002:

commit acca80acefe20420e69561cf55be64f16c34ea97
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Date: Tue Oct 29 23:54:35 2002 -0800

[PATCH] x86-64 updates for 2.5.44

...

- Remove the .eh_frame on linking. This saves several hundred KB in the
bzImage
]

Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191118175223.GM6363@zn.tnic/
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/760
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191126144545.19354-1-ilie.halip@gmail.com

x86/build: Use the single-argument OUTPUT_FORMAT() linker script command

The various x86 linker scripts use the three-argument linker script
command variant OUTPUT_FORMAT(DEFAULT, BIG, LITTLE) which specifies
three object file formats when the -EL and -EB linker command line
options are used. When -EB is specified, OUTPUT_FORMAT issues the BIG
object file format, when -EL, LITTLE, respectively, and when neither is
specified, DEFAULT.

However, those -E[LB] options are not used by arch/x86/ so switch to the
simple OUTPUT_FORMAT(BFDNAME) macro variant.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190109181531.27513-1-bp@alien8.de

x86, boot: Define the 2.12 bzImage boot protocol

Define the 2.12 bzImage boot protocol: add xloadflags and additional
fields to allow the command line, initramfs and struct boot_params to
live above the 4 GiB mark.

The xloadflags now communicates if this is a 64-bit kernel with the
legacy 64-bit entry point and which of the EFI handover entry points
are supported.

Avoid adding new read flags to loadflags because of claimed
bootloaders testing the whole byte for == 1 to determine bzImageness
at least until the issue can be researched further.

This is based on patches by Yinghai Lu and David Woodhouse.

Originally-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Originally-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359058816-7615-26-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: Gokul Caushik <caushik1@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@gmail.com>

x86: Document linker script ASSERT() quirk

Older binutils breaks if ASSERT() is used without a sink
for the output.

For example 2.14.90.0.6 is known to be broken, the link
fails with:

LD .tmp_vmlinux1
ld:arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds:678: parse error

Document this quirk in all three files that use it.

See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=124930110427870&w=2
See[2]: d2ba8b2 ("x86: Fix assert syntax in vmlinux.lds.S")

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
LKML-Reference: <4AD6523D.5030909@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS calls -- infrastructure

Impact: new interfaces (not yet used)

For all the platforms out there, there is an infinite number of buggy
BIOSes. This adds infrastructure to treat BIOS interrupts more like
toxic waste and "glove box" them -- we switch out the register set,
perform the BIOS interrupt, and then restore the previous state.

LKML-Reference: <49DE7F79.4030106@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

x86, setup: move 32-bit code to .text32

Impact: cleanup

The setup code is mostly 16-bit code, but there is a small stub of
32-bit code at the end. Move the 32-bit code to a separate segment,
.text32, to avoid scrambling the disassembly.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

i386: move boot

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>