powerpc/qspinlock: powerpc qspinlock implementation

Add a powerpc specific implementation of queued spinlocks. This is the
build framework with a very simple (non-queued) spinlock implementation
to begin with. Later changes add queueing, and other features and
optimisations one-at-a-time. It is done this way to more easily see how
the queued spinlocks are built, and to make performance and correctness
bisects more useful.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[mpe: Drop paravirt.h & processor.h changes to fix 32-bit build]
[mpe: Fix 32-bit build of qspinlock.o & disallow GENERIC_LOCKBREAK per Nick]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CONLLQB6DCJU.2ZPOS7T6S5GRR@bobo

powerpc/spinlock: Define smp_mb__after_spinlock only once

Instead of both queued and simple spinlocks doing it. Move
it into the arch's spinlock.h.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309015950.27688-2-dave@stgolabs.net

powerpc/pseries: Implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR

This implements the generic paravirt qspinlocks using H_PROD and
H_CONFER to kick and wait.

This uses an un-directed yield to any CPU rather than the directed
yield to a pre-empted lock holder that paravirtualised simple
spinlocks use, that requires no kick hcall. This is something that
could be investigated and improved in future.

Performance results can be found in the commit which added queued
spinlocks.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-5-npiggin@gmail.com

powerpc/64s: Implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks

These have shown significantly improved performance and fairness when
spinlock contention is moderate to high on very large systems.

With this series including subsequent patches, on a 16 socket 1536
thread POWER9, a stress test such as same-file open/close from all
CPUs gets big speedups, 11620op/s aggregate with simple spinlocks vs
384158op/s (33x faster), where the difference in throughput between
the fastest and slowest thread goes from 7x to 1.4x.

Thanks to the fast path being identical in terms of atomics and
barriers (after a subsequent optimisation patch), single threaded
performance is not changed (no measurable difference).

On smaller systems, performance and fairness seems to be generally
improved. Using dbench on tmpfs as a test (that starts to run into
kernel spinlock contention), a 2-socket OpenPOWER POWER9 system was
tested with bare metal and KVM guest configurations. Results can be
found here:

https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/305#issuecomment-663487453

Observations are:

- Queued spinlocks are equal when contention is insignificant, as
expected and as measured with microbenchmarks.

- When there is contention, on bare metal queued spinlocks have better
throughput and max latency at all points.

- When virtualised, queued spinlocks are slightly worse approaching
peak throughput, but significantly better throughput and max latency
at all points beyond peak, until queued spinlock maximum latency
rises when clients are 2x vCPUs.

The regressions haven't been analysed very well yet, there are a lot
of things that can be tuned, particularly the paravirtualised locking,
but the numbers already look like a good net win even on relatively
small systems.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-4-npiggin@gmail.com

powerpc: Move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock

To prepare for queued spinlocks. This is a simple rename except to
update preprocessor guard name and a file reference.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-3-npiggin@gmail.com

powerpc/pseries: Move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file

These functions will be used by the queued spinlock implementation,
and may be useful elsewhere too, so move them out of spinlock.h.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-2-npiggin@gmail.com

powerpc: Remove IBM405 Erratum #77

This erratum is dedicated to IBM 405GP and STB03xxx
which are now gone.

Remove this erratum.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/44dbc08e9034681eb28324cbabc086e97044c36c.1590079969.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/spinlocks: Include correct header for static key

Recently, the spinlock implementation grew a static key optimization,
but the jump_label.h header include was left out, leading to build
errors:

linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h:44:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘static_branch_unlikely’
44 | if (!static_branch_unlikely(&shared_processor))

This commit adds the missing header.

mpe: The build break is only seen with CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=n.

Fixes: 656c21d6af5d ("powerpc/shared: Use static key to detect shared processor")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191223133147.129983-1-Jason@zx2c4.com

powerpc/shared: Use static key to detect shared processor

With the static key shared processor available, is_shared_processor()
can return without having to query the lppaca structure.

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213035036.6913-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au

powerpc/vcpu: Assume dedicated processors as non-preempt

With commit 247f2f6f3c70 ("sched/core: Don't schedule threads on
pre-empted vCPUs"), the scheduler avoids preempted vCPUs to schedule
tasks on wakeup. This leads to wrong choice of CPU, which in-turn
leads to larger wakeup latencies. Eventually, it leads to performance
regression in latency sensitive benchmarks like soltp, schbench etc.

On Powerpc, vcpu_is_preempted() only looks at yield_count. If the
yield_count is odd, the vCPU is assumed to be preempted. However
yield_count is increased whenever the LPAR enters CEDE state (idle).
So any CPU that has entered CEDE state is assumed to be preempted.

Even if vCPU of dedicated LPAR is preempted/donated, it should have
right of first-use since they are supposed to own the vCPU.

On a Power9 System with 32 cores:
# lscpu
Architecture: ppc64le
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 128
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-127
Thread(s) per core: 8
Core(s) per socket: 1
Socket(s): 16
NUMA node(s): 2
Model: 2.2 (pvr 004e 0202)
Model name: POWER9 (architected), altivec supported
Hypervisor vendor: pHyp
Virtualization type: para
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 512K
L3 cache: 10240K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-63
NUMA node1 CPU(s): 64-127

# perf stat -a -r 5 ./schbench
v5.4 v5.4 + patch
Latency percentiles (usec) Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0000th: 45 50.0th: 45
75.0000th: 62 75.0th: 63
90.0000th: 71 90.0th: 74
95.0000th: 77 95.0th: 78
*99.0000th: 91 *99.0th: 82
99.5000th: 707 99.5th: 83
99.9000th: 6920 99.9th: 86
min=0, max=10048 min=0, max=96
Latency percentiles (usec) Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0000th: 45 50.0th: 46
75.0000th: 61 75.0th: 64
90.0000th: 72 90.0th: 75
95.0000th: 79 95.0th: 79
*99.0000th: 691 *99.0th: 83
99.5000th: 3972 99.5th: 85
99.9000th: 8368 99.9th: 91
min=0, max=16606 min=0, max=117
Latency percentiles (usec) Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0000th: 45 50.0th: 46
75.0000th: 61 75.0th: 64
90.0000th: 71 90.0th: 75
95.0000th: 77 95.0th: 79
*99.0000th: 106 *99.0th: 83
99.5000th: 2364 99.5th: 84
99.9000th: 7480 99.9th: 90
min=0, max=10001 min=0, max=95
Latency percentiles (usec) Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0000th: 45 50.0th: 47
75.0000th: 62 75.0th: 65
90.0000th: 72 90.0th: 75
95.0000th: 78 95.0th: 79
*99.0000th: 93 *99.0th: 84
99.5000th: 108 99.5th: 85
99.9000th: 6792 99.9th: 90
min=0, max=17681 min=0, max=117
Latency percentiles (usec) Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0000th: 46 50.0th: 45
75.0000th: 62 75.0th: 64
90.0000th: 73 90.0th: 75
95.0000th: 79 95.0th: 79
*99.0000th: 113 *99.0th: 82
99.5000th: 2724 99.5th: 83
99.9000th: 6184 99.9th: 93
min=0, max=9887 min=0, max=111

Performance counter stats for 'system wide' (5 runs):

context-switches 43,373 ( +- 0.40% ) 44,597 ( +- 0.55% )
cpu-migrations 1,211 ( +- 5.04% ) 220 ( +- 6.23% )
page-faults 15,983 ( +- 5.21% ) 15,360 ( +- 3.38% )

Waiman Long suggested using static_keys.

Fixes: 247f2f6f3c70 ("sched/core: Don't schedule threads on pre-empted vCPUs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18+
Reported-by: Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Ihor Pasichnyk <Ihor.Pasichnyk@ibm.com>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>
[mpe: Move the key and setting of the key to pseries/setup.c]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213035036.6913-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au

powerpc/spinlocks: Fix oops in __spin_yield() on bare metal

Booting w/ppc64le_defconfig + CONFIG_PREEMPT on bare metal results in
the oops below due to calling into __spin_yield() when not running in
an SPLPAR, which means lppaca pointers are NULL.

We fixed a similar case previously in commit a6201da34ff9 ("powerpc:
Fix oops due to bad access of lppaca on bare metal"), by adding SPLPAR
checks in lppaca_shared_proc(). However when PREEMPT is enabled we can
call __spin_yield() directly from arch_spin_yield().

To fix it add spin_yield() and rw_yield() which check that
shared-processor LPAR is enabled before calling the SPLPAR-only
implementation of each.

BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0x00000100
Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000097f88
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 7 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix MMU=Hash PREEMPT SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-00491-g249155c20f9b #28
NIP: c000000000097f88 LR: c000000000c07a88 CTR: c00000000015ca10
REGS: c0000000727079f0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.2.0-rc6-00491-g249155c20f9b)
MSR: 9000000002009033 <SF,HV,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 84000424 XER: 20040000
CFAR: c000000000c07a84 DAR: 0000000000000100 DSISR: 00080000 IRQMASK: 1
GPR00: c000000000c07a88 c000000072707c80 c000000001546300 c00000007be38a80
GPR04: c0000000726f0c00 0000000000000002 c00000007279c980 0000000000000100
GPR08: c000000001581b78 0000000080000001 0000000000000008 c00000007279c9b0
GPR12: 0000000000000000 c000000001730000 c000000000142558 0000000000000000
GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR24: c00000007be38a80 c000000000c002f4 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR28: c000000072221a00 c0000000726c2600 c00000007be38a80 c00000007be38a80
NIP [c000000000097f88] __spin_yield+0x48/0xa0
LR [c000000000c07a88] __raw_spin_lock+0xb8/0xc0
Call Trace:
[c000000072707c80] [c000000072221a00] 0xc000000072221a00 (unreliable)
[c000000072707cb0] [c000000000bffb0c] __schedule+0xbc/0x850
[c000000072707d70] [c000000000c002f4] schedule+0x54/0x130
[c000000072707da0] [c0000000001427dc] kthreadd+0x28c/0x2b0
[c000000072707e20] [c00000000000c1cc] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70
Instruction dump:
4d9e0020 552a043e 210a07ff 79080fe0 0b080000 3d020004 3908b878 794a1f24
e8e80000 7ce7502a e8e70000 38e70100 <7ca03c2c> 70a70001 78a50020 4d820020
---[ end trace 474d6b2b8fc5cb7e ]---

Fixes: 499dcd41378e ("powerpc/64s: Allocate LPPACAs individually")
Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <cmr@informatik.wtf>
[mpe: Reword change log a bit]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190813031314.1828-4-cmr@informatik.wtf

powerpc/spinlocks: Rename SPLPAR-only spinlocks

The __rw_yield and __spin_yield locks only pertain to SPLPAR mode.
Rename them to make this relationship obvious.

Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <cmr@informatik.wtf>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190813031314.1828-3-cmr@informatik.wtf

powerpc/spinlocks: Refactor SHARED_PROCESSOR

Determining if a processor is in shared processor mode is not a constant
so don't hide it behind a #define.

Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <cmr@informatik.wtf>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190813031314.1828-2-cmr@informatik.wtf

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

powerpc/mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code

In a bid to kill off explicit mmiowb() usage in driver code, hook up
the asm-generic mmiowb() tracking code but provide a definition of
arch_mmiowb_state() so that the tracking data can remain in the paca
as it does at present

This replaces the existing (flawed) implementation.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

powerpc: move ASM_CONST and stringify_in_c() into asm-const.h

This patch moves ASM_CONST() and stringify_in_c() into
dedicated asm-const.h, then cleans all related inclusions.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
[mpe: asm-compat.h should include asm-const.h]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/405: move PPC405_ERR77 in asm-405.h

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc: Fix oops due to bad access of lppaca on bare metal

Commit 8e0b634b1327 ("powerpc/64s: Do not allocate lppaca if we are
not virtualized") removed allocation of lppaca on bare metal
platforms. But with CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR enabled, we still access the
lppaca on bare metal in some code paths.

Fix this but adding runtime checks for SPLPAR (shared processor LPAR).

Fixes: 8e0b634b1327 ("powerpc/64s: Do not allocate lppaca if we are not virtualized")
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

locking/arch: Remove dummy arch_{read,spin,write}_lock_flags() implementations

The arch_{read,spin,write}_lock_flags() macros are simply mapped to the
non-flags versions by the majority of architectures, so do this in core
code and remove the dummy implementations. Also remove the implementation
in spinlock_up.h, since all callers of do_raw_spin_lock_flags() call
local_irq_save(flags) anyway.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()

Outside of the locking code itself, {read,spin,write}_can_lock() have no
users in tree. Apparmor (the last remaining user of write_can_lock()) got
moved over to lockdep by the previous patch.

This patch removes the use of {read,spin,write}_can_lock() from the
BUILD_LOCK_OPS macro, deferring to the trylock operation for testing the
lock status, and subsequently removes the unused macros altogether. They
aren't guaranteed to work in a concurrent environment and can give
incorrect results in the case of qrwlock.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

arch: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions

There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait() for all architectures providing them.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

locking: Introduce smp_mb__after_spinlock()

Since its inception, our understanding of ACQUIRE, esp. as applied to
spinlocks, has changed somewhat. Also, I wonder if, with a simple
change, we cannot make it provide more.

The problem with the comment is that the STORE done by spin_lock isn't
itself ordered by the ACQUIRE, and therefore a later LOAD can pass over
it and cross with any prior STORE, rendering the default WMB
insufficient (pointed out by Alan).

Now, this is only really a problem on PowerPC and ARM64, both of
which already defined smp_mb__before_spinlock() as a smp_mb().

At the same time, we can get a much stronger construct if we place
that same barrier _inside_ the spin_lock(). In that case we upgrade
the RCpc spinlock to an RCsc. That would make all schedule() calls
fully transitive against one another.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

locking/core, powerpc: Implement vcpu_is_preempted(cpu)

Optimize spinlock and mutex busy-loops by providing a vcpu_is_preempted(cpu)
function on pSeries. We do not support PowerNV.

All this can be achieved by using lppaca->yield_count, which is zero on PowerNV.

Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David.Laight@ACULAB.COM
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: bsingharora@gmail.com
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478077718-37424-5-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

powerpc/spinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait()

There is an ordering issue with spin_unlock_wait() on powerpc, because
the spin_lock primitive is an ACQUIRE and an ACQUIRE is only ordering
the load part of the operation with memory operations following it.
Therefore the following event sequence can happen:

CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3

================== ==================== ==============
spin_unlock(&lock);
spin_lock(&lock):
r1 = *lock; // r1 == 0;
o = object; o = READ_ONCE(object); // reordered here
object = NULL;
smp_mb();
spin_unlock_wait(&lock);
*lock = 1;
smp_mb();
o->dead = true; < o = READ_ONCE(object); > // reordered upwards
if (o) // true
BUG_ON(o->dead); // true!!

To fix this, we add a "nop" ll/sc loop in arch_spin_unlock_wait() on
ppc, the "nop" ll/sc loop reads the lock
value and writes it back atomically, in this way it will synchronize the
view of the lock on CPU1 with that on CPU2. Therefore in the scenario
above, either CPU2 will fail to get the lock at first or CPU1 will see
the lock acquired by CPU2, both cases will eliminate this bug. This is a
similar idea as what Will Deacon did for ARM64 in:

d86b8da04dfa ("arm64: spinlock: serialise spin_unlock_wait against concurrent lockers")

Furthermore, if the "nop" ll/sc figures out the lock is locked, we
actually don't need to do the "nop" ll/sc trick again, we can just do a
normal load+check loop for the lock to be released, because in that
case, spin_unlock_wait() is called when someone is holding the lock, and
the store part of the "nop" ll/sc happens before the lock release of the
current lock holder:

"nop" ll/sc -> spin_unlock()

and the lock release happens before the next lock acquisition:

spin_unlock() -> spin_lock() <next holder>

which means the "nop" ll/sc happens before the next lock acquisition:

"nop" ll/sc -> spin_unlock() -> spin_lock() <next holder>

With a smp_mb() preceding spin_unlock_wait(), the store of object is
guaranteed to be observed by the next lock holder:

STORE -> smp_mb() -> "nop" ll/sc
-> spin_unlock() -> spin_lock() <next holder>

This patch therefore fixes the issue and also cleans the
arch_spin_unlock_wait() a little bit by removing superfluous memory
barriers in loops and consolidating the implementations for PPC32 and
PPC64 into one.

Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Inline the "nop" ll/sc loop and set EH=0, munge change log]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

rcu,locking: Privatize smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()

RCU is the only thing that uses smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), and is
likely the only thing that ever will use it, so this commit makes this
macro private to RCU.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>

powerpc: Add smp_mb() to arch_spin_is_locked()

The kernel defines the function spin_is_locked(), which can be used to
check if a spinlock is currently locked.

Using spin_is_locked() on a lock you don't hold is obviously racy. That
is, even though you may observe that the lock is unlocked, it may become
locked at any time.

There is (at least) one exception to that, which is if two locks are
used as a pair, and the holder of each checks the status of the other
before doing any update.

Assuming *A and *B are two locks, and *COUNTER is a shared non-atomic
value:

The first CPU does:

spin_lock(*A)

if spin_is_locked(*B)
# nothing
else
smp_mb()
LOAD r = *COUNTER
r++
STORE *COUNTER = r

spin_unlock(*A)

And the second CPU does:

spin_lock(*B)

if spin_is_locked(*A)
# nothing
else
smp_mb()
LOAD r = *COUNTER
r++
STORE *COUNTER = r

spin_unlock(*B)

Although this is a strange locking construct, it should work.

It seems to be understood, but not documented, that spin_is_locked() is
not a memory barrier, so in the examples above and below the caller
inserts its own memory barrier before acting on the result of
spin_is_locked().

For now we assume spin_is_locked() is implemented as below, and we break
it out in our examples:

bool spin_is_locked(*LOCK) {
LOAD l = *LOCK
return l.locked
}

Our intuition is that there should be no problem even if the two code
sequences run simultaneously such as:

CPU 0 CPU 1
==================================================
spin_lock(*A) spin_lock(*B)
LOAD b = *B LOAD a = *A
if b.locked # true if a.locked # true
# nothing # nothing
spin_unlock(*A) spin_unlock(*B)

If one CPU gets the lock before the other then it will do the update and
the other CPU will back off:

CPU 0 CPU 1
==================================================
spin_lock(*A)
LOAD b = *B
spin_lock(*B)
if b.locked # false LOAD a = *A
else if a.locked # true
smp_mb() # nothing
LOAD r1 = *COUNTER spin_unlock(*B)
r1++
STORE *COUNTER = r1
spin_unlock(*A)

However in reality spin_lock() itself is not indivisible. On powerpc we
implement it as a load-and-reserve and store-conditional.

Ignoring the retry logic for the lost reservation case, it boils down to:
spin_lock(*LOCK) {
LOAD l = *LOCK
l.locked = true
STORE *LOCK = l
ACQUIRE_BARRIER
}

The ACQUIRE_BARRIER is required to give spin_lock() ACQUIRE semantics as
defined in memory-barriers.txt:

This acts as a one-way permeable barrier. It guarantees that all
memory operations after the ACQUIRE operation will appear to happen
after the ACQUIRE operation with respect to the other components of
the system.

On modern powerpc systems we use lwsync for ACQUIRE_BARRIER. lwsync is
also know as "lightweight sync", or "sync 1".

As described in Power ISA v2.07 section B.2.1.1, in this scenario the
lwsync is not the barrier itself. It instead causes the LOAD of *LOCK to
act as the barrier, preventing any loads or stores in the locked region
from occurring prior to the load of *LOCK.

Whether this behaviour is in accordance with the definition of ACQUIRE
semantics in memory-barriers.txt is open to discussion, we may switch to
a different barrier in future.

What this means in practice is that the following can occur:

CPU 0 CPU 1
==================================================
LOAD a = *A LOAD b = *B
a.locked = true b.locked = true
LOAD b = *B LOAD a = *A
STORE *A = a STORE *B = b
if b.locked # false if a.locked # false
else else
smp_mb() smp_mb()
LOAD r1 = *COUNTER LOAD r2 = *COUNTER
r1++ r2++
STORE *COUNTER = r1
STORE *COUNTER = r2 # Lost update
spin_unlock(*A) spin_unlock(*B)

That is, the load of *B can occur prior to the store that makes *A
visibly locked. And similarly for CPU 1. The result is both CPUs hold
their lock and believe the other lock is unlocked.

The easiest fix for this is to add a full memory barrier to the start of
spin_is_locked(), so adding to our previous definition would give us:

bool spin_is_locked(*LOCK) {
smp_mb()
LOAD l = *LOCK
return l.locked
}

The new barrier orders the store to the lock we are locking vs the load
of the other lock:

CPU 0 CPU 1
==================================================
LOAD a = *A LOAD b = *B
a.locked = true b.locked = true
STORE *A = a STORE *B = b
smp_mb() smp_mb()
LOAD b = *B LOAD a = *A
if b.locked # true if a.locked # true
# nothing # nothing
spin_unlock(*A) spin_unlock(*B)

Although the above example is theoretical, there is code similar to this
example in sem_lock() in ipc/sem.c. This commit in addition to the next
commit appears to be a fix for crashes we are seeing in that code where
we believe this race happens in practice.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Implement arch_spin_is_locked() using arch_spin_value_unlocked()

At a glance these are just the inverse of each other. The one subtlety
is that arch_spin_value_unlocked() takes the lock by value, rather than
as a pointer, which is important for the lockref code.

On the other hand arch_spin_is_locked() doesn't really care, so
implement it in terms of arch_spin_value_unlocked().

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Add support for the optimised lockref implementation

This commit adds the architecture support required to enable the
optimised implementation of lockrefs.

That's as simple as defining arch_spin_value_unlocked() and selecting
the Kconfig option.

We also define cmpxchg64_relaxed(), because the lockref code does not
need the cmpxchg to have barrier semantics.

Using Linus' test case[1] on one system I see a 4x improvement for the
basic enablement, and a further 1.3x for cmpxchg64_relaxed(), for a
total of 5.3x vs the baseline.

On another system I see more like 2x improvement.

[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=137782380714721&w=4

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Full barrier for smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()

The powerpc lock acquisition sequence is as follows:

lwarx; cmpwi; bne; stwcx.; lwsync;

Lock release is as follows:

lwsync; stw;

If CPU 0 does a store (say, x=1) then a lock release, and CPU 1
does a lock acquisition then a load (say, r1=y), then there is
no guarantee of a full memory barrier between the store to 'x'
and the load from 'y'. To see this, suppose that CPUs 0 and 1
are hardware threads in the same core that share a store buffer,
and that CPU 2 is in some other core, and that CPU 2 does the
following:

y = 1; sync; r2 = x;

If 'x' and 'y' are both initially zero, then the lock
acquisition and release sequences above can result in r1 and r2
both being equal to zero, which could not happen if unlock+lock
was a full barrier.

This commit therefore makes powerpc's
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() be a full barrier.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1386799151-2219-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

powerpc: Make rwlocks endian safe

Our ppc64 spinlocks and rwlocks use a trick where a lock token and
the paca index are placed in the lock with a single store. Since we
are using two u16s they need adjusting for little endian.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Stop using non-architected shared_proc field in lppaca

Although the shared_proc field in the lppaca works today, it is
not architected. A shared processor partition will always have a non
zero yield_count so use that instead. Create a wrapper so users
don't have to know about the details.

In order for older kernels to continue to work on KVM we need
to set the shared_proc bit. While here, remove the ugly bitfield.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Avoid debug_smp_processor_id() check in SHARED_PROCESSOR

Use local_paca directly in macro SHARED_PROCESSOR, as all processors
have the same value for the field shared_proc, so we don't need care
racy here.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Remove the remaining CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES pieces

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Rename LWSYNC_ON_SMP to PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER, ISYNC_ON_SMP to PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER

For performance reasons we are about to change ISYNC_ON_SMP to sometimes be
lwsync. Now that the macro name doesn't make sense, change it and LWSYNC_ON_SMP
to better explain what the barriers are doing.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc: Use lwarx hint in spinlocks

Recent versions of the PowerPC architecture added a hint bit to the larx
instructions to differentiate between an atomic operation and a lock operation:

> 0 Other programs might attempt to modify the word in storage addressed by EA
> even if the subsequent Store Conditional succeeds.
>
> 1 Other programs will not attempt to modify the word in storage addressed by
> EA until the program that has acquired the lock performs a subsequent store
> releasing the lock.

To avoid a binutils dependency this patch create macros for the extended lwarx
format and uses it in the spinlock code. To test this change I used a simple
test case that acquires and releases a global pthread mutex:

pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);

On a 32 core POWER6, running 32 test threads we spend almost all our time in
the futex spinlock code:

94.37% perf [kernel] [k] ._raw_spin_lock
|
|--99.95%-- ._raw_spin_lock
| |
| |--63.29%-- .futex_wake
| |
| |--36.64%-- .futex_wait_setup

Which is a good test for this patch. The results (in lock/unlock operations per
second) are:

before: 1538203 ops/sec
after: 2189219 ops/sec

An improvement of 42%

A 32 core POWER7 improves even more:

before: 1279529 ops/sec
after: 2282076 ops/sec

An improvement of 78%

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

locking: Convert raw_rwlock functions to arch_rwlock

Name space cleanup for rwlock functions. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org

locking: Convert raw_rwlock to arch_rwlock

Not strictly necessary for -rt as -rt does not have non sleeping
rwlocks, but it's odd to not have a consistent naming convention.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org

locking: Convert __raw_spin* functions to arch_spin*

Name space cleanup. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org

locking: Convert raw_spinlock to arch_spinlock

The raw_spin* namespace was taken by lockdep for the architecture
specific implementations. raw_spin_* would be the ideal name space for
the spinlocks which are not converted to sleeping locks in preempt-rt.

Linus suggested to convert the raw_ to arch_ locks and cleanup the
name space instead of using an artifical name like core_spin,
atomic_spin or whatever

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org

locking, powerpc: Rename __spin_try_lock() and friends

Needed to avoid namespace conflicts when the common code
function bodies of _spin_try_lock() etc. are moved to a header
file where the function name would be __spin_try_lock().

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Horst Hartmann <horsth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <20090831124415.918799705@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Allow rwlocks to re-enable interrupts

Pass the original flags to rwlock arch-code, so that it can re-enable
interrupts if implemented for that architecture.

Initially, make __raw_read_lock_flags and __raw_write_lock_flags stubs
which just do the same thing as non-flags variants.

Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

powerpc: Tell gcc when we clobber the carry in inline asm

We have several instances of inline assembly code that use the addic
or addic. instructions, but don't include XER in the list of clobbers.
The addic and addic. instructions affect the carry bit, which is in
the XER register.

This adds "xer" to the list of clobbers for those inline asm
statements that use addic or addic. and didn't already have it.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

powerpc: Move include files to arch/powerpc/include/asm

from include/asm-powerpc. This is the result of a

mkdir arch/powerpc/include/asm
git mv include/asm-powerpc/* arch/powerpc/include/asm

Followed by a few documentation/comment fixups and a couple of places
where <asm-powepc/...> was being used explicitly. Of the latter only
one was outside the arch code and it is a driver only built for powerpc.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>