| 332609 |
16-Apr-2018 |
asomers |
MFC r330710, r330718-r330720
r330710:
tftpd: Flush files as soon as they are fully received
On an RRQ, tftpd doesn't exit as soon as it's finished receiving a file.
Instead, it waits five seconds just in case the client didn't receive the
server's last ACK and decides to resend the final DATA packet.
Unfortunately, this created a 5 second delay from when the client thinks
it's done sending the file, and when the file is available for other
processes.
Fix this bug by closing the file as soon as receipt is finished.
PR: 157700
Reported by: Barry Mishler <barry_mishler@yahoo.com>
r330718:
tftpd: Verify world-writability for WRQ when using relative paths
tftpd(8) says that files may only be written if they already exist and are
publicly writable. tftpd.c verifies that a file is publicly writable if it
uses an absolute pathname. However, if the pathname is relative, that check
is skipped. Fix it.
Note that this is not a security vulnerability, because the transfer
ultimately doesn't work unless the file already exists and is owned by user
nobody. Also, this bug does not affect the default configuration, because
the default uses the "-s" option which makes all pathnames absolute.
PR: 226004
r330719:
tftpd: Abort on an WRQ access violation
On a WRQ (write request) tftpd checks whether the client has access
permission for the file in question. If not, then the write is prevented.
However, tftpd doesn't reply with an ERROR packet, nor does it abort.
Instead, it tries to receive the packet anyway.
The symptom is slightly different depending on the nature of the error. If
the target file is nonexistent and tftpd lacks permission to create it, then
tftpd will willingly receive the file, but not write it anywhere. If the
file exists but is not writable, then tftpd will fail to ACK to WRQ.
PR: 225996
r330720:
tftpd: reject unknown opcodes
If tftpd receives a command with an unknown opcode, it simply exits 1. It
doesn't send an ERROR packet, and the client will hang waiting for one. Fix
it.
PR: 226005 |
| 332608 |
16-Apr-2018 |
asomers |
MFC r330696, r330709, r330742, r331358
r330696:
Add some functional tests for tftpd(8)
tftpd(8) is difficult to test in isolation due to its relationship with
inetd. Create a test program that mimics the behavior of tftp(1) and
inetd(8) and verifies tftpd's response in several different scenarios.
These test cases cover all of the basic TFTP protocol, but not the optional
parts.
PR: 157700
PR: 225996
PR: 226004
PR: 226005
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14310
r330709:
Commit missing file from r330696
X-MFC-With: 330696
r330742:
tftpd: fix the build of tests on i386 after 330696
It's those darn printf format specifiers again
Reported by: cy, kibab
X-MFC-With: 330696
r331358:
tftpd: misc Coverity cleanup in the tests
A bunch of unchecked return values from open(2) and read(2)
Reported by: Coverity
CID: 1386900, 1386911, 1386926, 1386928, 1386932, 1386942
CID: 1386961, 1386979
X-MFC-With: 330696 |