History log of /freebsd-10.0-release/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/roff/
Revision Date Author Comments
(<<< Hide modified files)
(Show modified files >>>)
259065 07-Dec-2013 gjb

- Copy stable/10 (r259064) to releng/10.0 as part of the
10.0-RELEASE cycle.
- Update __FreeBSD_version [1]
- Set branch name to -RC1

[1] 10.0-CURRENT __FreeBSD_version value ended at '55', so
start releng/10.0 at '100' so the branch is started with
a value ending in zero.

Approved by: re (implicit)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

256281 10-Oct-2013 gjb

Copy head (r256279) to stable/10 as part of the 10.0-RELEASE cycle.

Approved by: re (implicit)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation


151504 20-Oct-2005 ru

Upgrade to Groff 1.19.2.


114412 01-May-2003 ru

Upgrade to Groff 1.19.


105822 23-Oct-2002 gallatin

Remove the hack to build groff statically on alpha, now that the rtld
has been extended to grok binaries with only one PLT_LOAD segment

An UPDATING entry about this is pending review..

Approved by: ru


105600 21-Oct-2002 obrien

Make static in our normal manner.

Submitted by: bde


105593 21-Oct-2002 obrien

Unbreak Alpha world.
We are seeing "/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: groff: too few PT_LOAD segments",
however it appears that there really is only one PT_LOAD segment in the groff
binary. It is unclear if `rtld' or `ld' is at fault here -- but using an
RELENG_4 `ld' binary allows one to build a working dynamic groff binary.

Submitted by: gallatin


94427 11-Apr-2002 ru

Revert the last change and mark the program as PROG_CXX.


94013 07-Apr-2002 peter

Add -lstdc++ to the link args for these C++ tools so that they can be
compiled with gcc-3.1. Somebody thought it was a good idea to move
the implementation of new and delete from libgcc to libstdc++. This
change doesn't harm the current compiler in the tree.


79552 10-Jul-2001 ru

Add $FreeBSD$ CVS tag.


75592 17-Apr-2001 ru

Upgrade to Groff 1.17.


75387 10-Apr-2001 ru

psroff(1) has never been a part of Groff.


18127 08-Sep-1996 pst

Add psroff command